NATO AND THE RUSSIAN INVASION OF UKRAINE: DIFFERENT REACTIONS TO THE RUSSIAN ACTION
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14230%2F15%3A00089371" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14230/15:00089371 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5593/SGEMSOCIAL2015/B21/S4.028" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.5593/SGEMSOCIAL2015/B21/S4.028</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5593/SGEMSOCIAL2015/B21/S4.028" target="_blank" >10.5593/SGEMSOCIAL2015/B21/S4.028</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
NATO AND THE RUSSIAN INVASION OF UKRAINE: DIFFERENT REACTIONS TO THE RUSSIAN ACTION
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
The relations between NATO and Ukraine have been discussed in scholarly literature for the two last decades. This issue obtained new dynamics after the 2014 Russian invasion of Ukraine, which had led to the annexation of Crimea and occupation of the eastern parts of the country by Russian army and forces controlled by Russia. After the Russian invasion of Ukraine in 2014, NATO condemned the Russian policy on many occasions, provided Ukraine with diplomatic support and launched several programs that were supposed to help Ukraine eliminate deficits in its military capacity limiting Ukrainian possibilities to face Russian aggression. However, NATO member states are not united in their attitude towards the ongoing crisis and one can identify at least four groups of states in NATO. The first group consists of fundamental critics of Russian behaviour because the Russian activities undermine the ongoing international order.
Název v anglickém jazyce
NATO AND THE RUSSIAN INVASION OF UKRAINE: DIFFERENT REACTIONS TO THE RUSSIAN ACTION
Popis výsledku anglicky
The relations between NATO and Ukraine have been discussed in scholarly literature for the two last decades. This issue obtained new dynamics after the 2014 Russian invasion of Ukraine, which had led to the annexation of Crimea and occupation of the eastern parts of the country by Russian army and forces controlled by Russia. After the Russian invasion of Ukraine in 2014, NATO condemned the Russian policy on many occasions, provided Ukraine with diplomatic support and launched several programs that were supposed to help Ukraine eliminate deficits in its military capacity limiting Ukrainian possibilities to face Russian aggression. However, NATO member states are not united in their attitude towards the ongoing crisis and one can identify at least four groups of states in NATO. The first group consists of fundamental critics of Russian behaviour because the Russian activities undermine the ongoing international order.
Klasifikace
Druh
D - Stať ve sborníku
CEP obor
AD - Politologie a politické vědy
OECD FORD obor
—
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2015
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název statě ve sborníku
Conference: International Multidisciplinary Scientific Conferences on Social Sciences and Arts (SGEM 2015)
ISBN
9786197105469
ISSN
2367-5659
e-ISSN
—
Počet stran výsledku
6
Strana od-do
215-220
Název nakladatele
SGEM
Místo vydání
Albena
Místo konání akce
Albena
Datum konání akce
1. 1. 2015
Typ akce podle státní příslušnosti
WRD - Celosvětová akce
Kód UT WoS článku
—