Stabilization and Resettlement in the Post-War South Ossetia

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14230%2F16%3A00093041" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14230/16:00093041 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5593/sgemsocial2016B22" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.5593/sgemsocial2016B22</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5593/sgemsocial2016B22" target="_blank" >10.5593/sgemsocial2016B22</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Stabilization and Resettlement in the Post-War South Ossetia

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Although it was only five days long, the war in South Ossetia was an example of great violence, and more significantly an indicator of diplomatic failure. Given the unresolved status of South Ossetia, this article studies the key agendas and activities of the major actors: 1) the Georgian government and the South Ossetia interim administration; 2) the Russian foreign ministry and the ministry of foreign relations of South Ossetia; and 3) the EU’s monitoring mission in Georgia. The article offers a qualitative analysis of: (a) defamatory diplomatic public statements and activities, including passportization; (b) foreign direct investments; and (c) ideological media campaigns. The study contributes to the wider literature on de-facto states and conflict resolution by shedding light on the process of foreign policy making and lobbying by diplomatic and political actors.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Stabilization and Resettlement in the Post-War South Ossetia

Popis výsledku anglicky

Although it was only five days long, the war in South Ossetia was an example of great violence, and more significantly an indicator of diplomatic failure. Given the unresolved status of South Ossetia, this article studies the key agendas and activities of the major actors: 1) the Georgian government and the South Ossetia interim administration; 2) the Russian foreign ministry and the ministry of foreign relations of South Ossetia; and 3) the EU’s monitoring mission in Georgia. The article offers a qualitative analysis of: (a) defamatory diplomatic public statements and activities, including passportization; (b) foreign direct investments; and (c) ideological media campaigns. The study contributes to the wider literature on de-facto states and conflict resolution by shedding light on the process of foreign policy making and lobbying by diplomatic and political actors.

Druh

D - Stať ve sborníku

CEP obor

AD - Politologie a politické vědy

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Rok uplatnění

2016

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název statě ve sborníku

SGEM: Political Science and Law Proceedings

ISBN

9786197105735

ISSN

—

e-ISSN

—

Počet stran výsledku

8

Strana od-do

341-348

Název nakladatele

International Multidisciplinary Scientific Conference on Social Science and Arts

Místo vydání

Sofia

Místo konání akce

Varna

Datum konání akce

1. 1. 2016

Typ akce podle státní příslušnosti

CST - Celostátní akce

Kód UT WoS článku

—