Quality of Rural Life : editorial
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14230%2F18%3A00101673" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14230/18:00101673 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://content.sciendo.com/view/journals/euco/10/2/article-p180.xml" target="_blank" >https://content.sciendo.com/view/journals/euco/10/2/article-p180.xml</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/euco-2018-0011" target="_blank" >10.2478/euco-2018-0011</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Quality of Rural Life : editorial
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
The paper discusses the concept of the quality of life and its measuring. It tries to explain its peculiarities in the rural space considering different levels of education, professional activities, mobility, ways of dwelling, access to the social and technical infrastructure. The subjective perception of both urban and rural people to the rural quality of life can be manifested in moving in and moving out. The main shortages of the rural quality of life can be seen (by rural people) in a poor access to the prestigious and well-paid jobs and to a richer social life. The main advantages of the rural way of life are generally evaluated (by urban people) by better access to the nature. A promotion of the local identity is considered as an important tool for improving the rural quality of life (besides of a solution of infrastructural problems), considering the enormous difference among European rural areas of a big differentiation of the European countryside. The last part of the paper summarizes the contributions of the special number.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Quality of Rural Life : editorial
Popis výsledku anglicky
The paper discusses the concept of the quality of life and its measuring. It tries to explain its peculiarities in the rural space considering different levels of education, professional activities, mobility, ways of dwelling, access to the social and technical infrastructure. The subjective perception of both urban and rural people to the rural quality of life can be manifested in moving in and moving out. The main shortages of the rural quality of life can be seen (by rural people) in a poor access to the prestigious and well-paid jobs and to a richer social life. The main advantages of the rural way of life are generally evaluated (by urban people) by better access to the nature. A promotion of the local identity is considered as an important tool for improving the rural quality of life (besides of a solution of infrastructural problems), considering the enormous difference among European rural areas of a big differentiation of the European countryside. The last part of the paper summarizes the contributions of the special number.
Klasifikace
Druh
O - Ostatní výsledky
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
50401 - Sociology
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
<a href="/cs/project/GA16-20873S" target="_blank" >GA16-20873S: Stárnutí na venkově: nezodpovězené otázky environmentální gerontologie</a><br>
Návaznosti
P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2018
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů