Juggling grammars, translating common-place : Justifying an anti-liberal referendum to a liberal public

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14230%2F18%3A00105811" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14230/18:00105811 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/23254823.2018.1436448" target="_blank" >https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/23254823.2018.1436448</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23254823.2018.1436448" target="_blank" >10.1080/23254823.2018.1436448</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Juggling grammars, translating common-place : Justifying an anti-liberal referendum to a liberal public

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

The revival of religion in politics and the rise of anti-liberal movements across Western democracies highlights the need to better grasp the ways participants in public controversies make their agendas intelligible, meaningful, and justified. While most theories of deliberative democracy presume an argumentative format, real-life political agendas often combine conventional arguments with mobilisations of emotions and religious engagement. Based on the analysis of a high-profile debate preceding the 2015 Slovak referendum on same-sex rights, this paper engages the notion of multiple grammars of commonality (Thévenot, 2014), to examine how personal attachments are formatted for public dispute and how different grammars are employed and mixed by referendum proponents and opponents. Discussing the difficulties in grasping religiously grounded standpoints with the pragmatic conceptual toolkit, we conclude that a pragmatic sociological understanding of the role of religion in communicating and composing difference needs to be revisited.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Juggling grammars, translating common-place : Justifying an anti-liberal referendum to a liberal public

Popis výsledku anglicky

The revival of religion in politics and the rise of anti-liberal movements across Western democracies highlights the need to better grasp the ways participants in public controversies make their agendas intelligible, meaningful, and justified. While most theories of deliberative democracy presume an argumentative format, real-life political agendas often combine conventional arguments with mobilisations of emotions and religious engagement. Based on the analysis of a high-profile debate preceding the 2015 Slovak referendum on same-sex rights, this paper engages the notion of multiple grammars of commonality (Thévenot, 2014), to examine how personal attachments are formatted for public dispute and how different grammars are employed and mixed by referendum proponents and opponents. Discussing the difficulties in grasping religiously grounded standpoints with the pragmatic conceptual toolkit, we conclude that a pragmatic sociological understanding of the role of religion in communicating and composing difference needs to be revisited.

Druh

J_SC - Článek v periodiku v databázi SCOPUS

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50400 - Sociology

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Rok uplatnění

2018

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

European Journal of Cultural and Political Sociology

ISSN

2325-4823

e-ISSN

2325-4815

Svazek periodika

5

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

1-2

Stát vydavatele periodika

GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska

Počet stran výsledku

29

Strana od-do

165-193

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85050769180