Psychometric evaluation of the Clinical Outcome in Routine Evaluation – General Population : Czech version

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14230%2F21%3A00121471" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14230/21:00121471 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://ceskoslovenskapsychologie.cz/index.php/csps/article/view/72" target="_blank" >https://ceskoslovenskapsychologie.cz/index.php/csps/article/view/72</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.51561/cspsych.65.2.163" target="_blank" >10.51561/cspsych.65.2.163</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Psychometric evaluation of the Clinical Outcome in Routine Evaluation – General Population : Czech version

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Objectives. This study aimed to assess psychometric properties, such as reliability, construct validity, and cut-off scores, for the Czech version of the Clinical Outcome in Routine Evaluation – General Population (GP-CORE) questionnaire, a tool usable for repeated measurement of psychological distress within routine clinical settings. Participants and setting. Two general populations and one clinical sample were used with N values of 420, 394, and 345, respectively. Hypotheses. One of the competing theoretical factor solutions will demonstrate the best fit. Statistical analysis. To examine the factor structure of the GP-CORE, a confirmatory multidimensional item response theory analysis (graded response model) was employed. Results. The best fitting model was a bifactor solution representing one content domain of overall distress and two item wording domains (positively and negatively worded items). Clinical cut-off scores were determined to be 1.85 (men) and 1.90 (women). Study limitations. The GP-CORE can be used as an unidimensional measure of overall distress, but users have to be aware of the influence of positive vs. negative item wording on the responses.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Psychometric evaluation of the Clinical Outcome in Routine Evaluation – General Population : Czech version

Popis výsledku anglicky

Objectives. This study aimed to assess psychometric properties, such as reliability, construct validity, and cut-off scores, for the Czech version of the Clinical Outcome in Routine Evaluation – General Population (GP-CORE) questionnaire, a tool usable for repeated measurement of psychological distress within routine clinical settings. Participants and setting. Two general populations and one clinical sample were used with N values of 420, 394, and 345, respectively. Hypotheses. One of the competing theoretical factor solutions will demonstrate the best fit. Statistical analysis. To examine the factor structure of the GP-CORE, a confirmatory multidimensional item response theory analysis (graded response model) was employed. Results. The best fitting model was a bifactor solution representing one content domain of overall distress and two item wording domains (positively and negatively worded items). Clinical cut-off scores were determined to be 1.85 (men) and 1.90 (women). Study limitations. The GP-CORE can be used as an unidimensional measure of overall distress, but users have to be aware of the influence of positive vs. negative item wording on the responses.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50100 - Psychology and cognitive sciences

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Rok uplatnění

2021

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Československá psychologie

ISSN

0009-062X

e-ISSN

1804-6436

Svazek periodika

65

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

2

Stát vydavatele periodika

CZ - Česká republika

Počet stran výsledku

15

Strana od-do

163-177

Kód UT WoS článku

000644715400004

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85105729406