Euromaidan(s) in Russian Academic Literature

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14230%2F21%3A00121571" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14230/21:00121571 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://brill.com/view/journals/rupo/6/2/article-p233_4.xml" target="_blank" >https://brill.com/view/journals/rupo/6/2/article-p233_4.xml</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.30965/24518921-00602004" target="_blank" >10.30965/24518921-00602004</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Euromaidan(s) in Russian Academic Literature

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Euromaidan events represented a major political issue for discussion among Russian political analysts. While from a distance the perception in Russian society of these events might seem monolithic, a closer look suggests that Euromaidan events spurred multiple reactions within the population. To demonstrate this, the article describes the different perceptions of Euromaidan in 108 texts published by Russian academics between 2013 and 2018. While analyzing the argumentation of these texts, it is possible to identify two main differences—terminology in the use of either coup or revolution to describe the happenings, and the importance of the local context for the course of events. Significant differences among texts allow us to conclude that there have been various interpretations of Euromaidan among Russian academics. This conclusion not only sheds new light on the state of public debate in the Russian Federation but can be also seen as a contribution to the debate about how so-called modern authoritarian regimes operate.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Euromaidan(s) in Russian Academic Literature

Popis výsledku anglicky

Euromaidan events represented a major political issue for discussion among Russian political analysts. While from a distance the perception in Russian society of these events might seem monolithic, a closer look suggests that Euromaidan events spurred multiple reactions within the population. To demonstrate this, the article describes the different perceptions of Euromaidan in 108 texts published by Russian academics between 2013 and 2018. While analyzing the argumentation of these texts, it is possible to identify two main differences—terminology in the use of either coup or revolution to describe the happenings, and the importance of the local context for the course of events. Significant differences among texts allow us to conclude that there have been various interpretations of Euromaidan among Russian academics. This conclusion not only sheds new light on the state of public debate in the Russian Federation but can be also seen as a contribution to the debate about how so-called modern authoritarian regimes operate.

Druh

J_SC - Článek v periodiku v databázi SCOPUS

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50601 - Political science

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Rok uplatnění

2021

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Russian Politics

ISSN

2451-8913

e-ISSN

2451-8921

Svazek periodika

6

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

2

Stát vydavatele periodika

NL - Nizozemsko

Počet stran výsledku

22

Strana od-do

233-254

Kód UT WoS článku

000659959600004

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85108312222