How a direct vote and public deliberation contribute to the legitimacy of political decision-making : examining situational and individual-level moderators
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14230%2F22%3A00119209" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14230/22:00119209 - isvavai.cz</a>
Nalezeny alternativní kódy
RIV/00216224:14230/22:00129006
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://link.springer.com/article/10.1057/s41269-021-00217-4" target="_blank" >https://link.springer.com/article/10.1057/s41269-021-00217-4</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/s41269-021-00217-4" target="_blank" >10.1057/s41269-021-00217-4</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
How a direct vote and public deliberation contribute to the legitimacy of political decision-making : examining situational and individual-level moderators
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
Direct voting and public deliberation are often considered as a means to increase legitimacy of political decision-making. This study investigates whether the legitimizing effects of these procedural arrangements are affected by the level of threat stemming from topic associated with a decision-making situation. Further, we explore potential individual-level moderators. A vignette experiment with a mixed design was conducted (N = 220). Results showed that the presence of a direct vote as well as public deliberation increased perceived legitimacy of the decision-making process, the effect of the latter being considerably stronger. Contrary to our expectations, all legitimizing effects remained unaffected by the presence of threat. Nevertheless, the legitimizing effect of a direct vote was stronger for people who were more alienated from and less interested in politics, while it was negligible if alienation was low and interest high. The legitimizing effect of public deliberation was less strong (but still present) for people with higher right-wing authoritarianism and lower political interest.
Název v anglickém jazyce
How a direct vote and public deliberation contribute to the legitimacy of political decision-making : examining situational and individual-level moderators
Popis výsledku anglicky
Direct voting and public deliberation are often considered as a means to increase legitimacy of political decision-making. This study investigates whether the legitimizing effects of these procedural arrangements are affected by the level of threat stemming from topic associated with a decision-making situation. Further, we explore potential individual-level moderators. A vignette experiment with a mixed design was conducted (N = 220). Results showed that the presence of a direct vote as well as public deliberation increased perceived legitimacy of the decision-making process, the effect of the latter being considerably stronger. Contrary to our expectations, all legitimizing effects remained unaffected by the presence of threat. Nevertheless, the legitimizing effect of a direct vote was stronger for people who were more alienated from and less interested in politics, while it was negligible if alienation was low and interest high. The legitimizing effect of public deliberation was less strong (but still present) for people with higher right-wing authoritarianism and lower political interest.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
50100 - Psychology and cognitive sciences
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
<a href="/cs/project/GA18-19883S" target="_blank" >GA18-19883S: Psychologické determinanty vnímané demokratické legitimity</a><br>
Návaznosti
P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2022
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Acta Politica
ISSN
0001-6810
e-ISSN
1741-1416
Svazek periodika
neuveden
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
neuveden
Stát vydavatele periodika
GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska
Počet stran výsledku
39
Strana od-do
1-39
Kód UT WoS článku
000696427300002
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-85115272816