Vše

Co hledáte?

Vše
Projekty
Výsledky výzkumu
Subjekty

Rychlé hledání

  • Projekty podpořené TA ČR
  • Významné projekty
  • Projekty s nejvyšší státní podporou
  • Aktuálně běžící projekty

Chytré vyhledávání

  • Takto najdu konkrétní +slovo
  • Takto z výsledků -slovo zcela vynechám
  • “Takto můžu najít celou frázi”

The legitimizing roles of respectful treatment and direct democracy in collective decision-making : A school-based study

Identifikátory výsledku

  • Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14230%2F22%3A00119322" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14230/22:00119322 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Výsledek na webu

    <a href="https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jasp.12839" target="_blank" >https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jasp.12839</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12839" target="_blank" >10.1111/jasp.12839</a>

Alternativní jazyky

  • Jazyk výsledku

    angličtina

  • Název v původním jazyce

    The legitimizing roles of respectful treatment and direct democracy in collective decision-making : A school-based study

  • Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

    According to the procedural justice approach, people tend to view authoritative decision-making as legitimate if it includes their voice and if they are treated with respect, even when the outcomes are unfavorable. However, previous research suggests that the application of these effects to collective decision-making is less straightforward. Therefore, this study investigates whether people's willingness to accept a collective decision is increased by two procedural aspects: the opportunity to directly vote on the outcome and respectful treatment from peers during the decision-making process. Moreover, we ask whether the effects are moderated by outcome favorability. A study was conducted in their classrooms on 395 Czech high school students (aged 18–20, 60% females) who used a randomly prescribed procedure (direct vote, or expert decision) to decide on the use of a sum of money. Respectful treatment was measured through students’ perceptions during the decision-making process. Results showed that while direct voting did not increase participants’ willingness to accept the outcome, perceived respectful treatment did. However, the positive effect of respectful treatment was present only among participants who were clearly dissatisfied with the outcome (i.e., it compensated for the lack of outcome favorability). Participants who perceived the outcome as favorable or had no clear preference between the alternatives were willing to accept the outcome despite the perception of not having been treated respectfully.

  • Název v anglickém jazyce

    The legitimizing roles of respectful treatment and direct democracy in collective decision-making : A school-based study

  • Popis výsledku anglicky

    According to the procedural justice approach, people tend to view authoritative decision-making as legitimate if it includes their voice and if they are treated with respect, even when the outcomes are unfavorable. However, previous research suggests that the application of these effects to collective decision-making is less straightforward. Therefore, this study investigates whether people's willingness to accept a collective decision is increased by two procedural aspects: the opportunity to directly vote on the outcome and respectful treatment from peers during the decision-making process. Moreover, we ask whether the effects are moderated by outcome favorability. A study was conducted in their classrooms on 395 Czech high school students (aged 18–20, 60% females) who used a randomly prescribed procedure (direct vote, or expert decision) to decide on the use of a sum of money. Respectful treatment was measured through students’ perceptions during the decision-making process. Results showed that while direct voting did not increase participants’ willingness to accept the outcome, perceived respectful treatment did. However, the positive effect of respectful treatment was present only among participants who were clearly dissatisfied with the outcome (i.e., it compensated for the lack of outcome favorability). Participants who perceived the outcome as favorable or had no clear preference between the alternatives were willing to accept the outcome despite the perception of not having been treated respectfully.

Klasifikace

  • Druh

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

  • CEP obor

  • OECD FORD obor

    50100 - Psychology and cognitive sciences

Návaznosti výsledku

  • Projekt

    <a href="/cs/project/GA18-19883S" target="_blank" >GA18-19883S: Psychologické determinanty vnímané demokratické legitimity</a><br>

  • Návaznosti

    P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Ostatní

  • Rok uplatnění

    2022

  • Kód důvěrnosti údajů

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku

  • Název periodika

    Journal of Applied Social Psychology

  • ISSN

    0021-9029

  • e-ISSN

    1559-1816

  • Svazek periodika

    52

  • Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

    2

  • Stát vydavatele periodika

    US - Spojené státy americké

  • Počet stran výsledku

    11

  • Strana od-do

    95-105

  • Kód UT WoS článku

    000714648500001

  • EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

    2-s2.0-85118491301