Repeated Recall of Repeated Events : Accuracy and Consistency

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14230%2F22%3A00125066" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14230/22:00125066 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2022-40593-001" target="_blank" >https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2022-40593-001</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2021.09.003" target="_blank" >10.1016/j.jarmac.2021.09.003</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Repeated Recall of Repeated Events : Accuracy and Consistency

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

In both casual conversations and interview settings, people may be required to provide details of instances that were similar to other experiences. When this happens repeatedly, consistency across reports is often taken as a proxy for credibility. However, processes of schema formation and interference due to similarity make recall and accurate source attribution of details to specific instances challenging. We investigated the accuracy and consistency of recall in these contexts in a re-analysis of five studies. Confusions of details were widespread (1) across instances-participants frequently attributed the origin of details to incorrect instances, but also (2) across repeated retrieval attempts-participants frequently changed parts of their reports. There was, however, a clear pattern of primacy and recency effects: Recall of the first and final instances was more accurate and consistent than recall of the middle instances. We discuss potential mechanisms underlying these effects as well as their practical implications.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Repeated Recall of Repeated Events : Accuracy and Consistency

Popis výsledku anglicky

In both casual conversations and interview settings, people may be required to provide details of instances that were similar to other experiences. When this happens repeatedly, consistency across reports is often taken as a proxy for credibility. However, processes of schema formation and interference due to similarity make recall and accurate source attribution of details to specific instances challenging. We investigated the accuracy and consistency of recall in these contexts in a re-analysis of five studies. Confusions of details were widespread (1) across instances-participants frequently attributed the origin of details to incorrect instances, but also (2) across repeated retrieval attempts-participants frequently changed parts of their reports. There was, however, a clear pattern of primacy and recency effects: Recall of the first and final instances was more accurate and consistent than recall of the middle instances. We discuss potential mechanisms underlying these effects as well as their practical implications.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50100 - Psychology and cognitive sciences

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2022

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition

ISSN

2211-3681

e-ISSN

2211-369X

Svazek periodika

11

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

2

Stát vydavatele periodika

US - Spojené státy americké

Počet stran výsledku

16

Strana od-do

229-244

Kód UT WoS článku

000819648800018

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85119264776