The Europeanization of territoriality and its limits : the territorial dimension of EU cohesion policy and its varying implementation

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14230%2F23%3A00129987" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14230/23:00129987 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09654313.2022.2091407" target="_blank" >https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09654313.2022.2091407</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2022.2091407" target="_blank" >10.1080/09654313.2022.2091407</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

The Europeanization of territoriality and its limits : the territorial dimension of EU cohesion policy and its varying implementation

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

In the framework of the territorial dimension of EU cohesion policy, the European Commission has been offering the establishment of functional regions. The response at the member state level has been very diverse, though. Whereas some states have established ‘new regions’, others have been reluctant to do so. The article argues that states and/or regions may veto the Europeanization process on the grounds of protecting their territoriality. More specifically, it avers that the more money is allocated in the member state and the less the cities are dominated by the regions, the higher the chance of differential empowerment of cities.

Název v anglickém jazyce

The Europeanization of territoriality and its limits : the territorial dimension of EU cohesion policy and its varying implementation

Popis výsledku anglicky

In the framework of the territorial dimension of EU cohesion policy, the European Commission has been offering the establishment of functional regions. The response at the member state level has been very diverse, though. Whereas some states have established ‘new regions’, others have been reluctant to do so. The article argues that states and/or regions may veto the Europeanization process on the grounds of protecting their territoriality. More specifically, it avers that the more money is allocated in the member state and the less the cities are dominated by the regions, the higher the chance of differential empowerment of cities.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50601 - Political science

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Rok uplatnění

2023

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

European Planning Studies

ISSN

0965-4313

e-ISSN

1469-5944

Svazek periodika

31

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

4

Stát vydavatele periodika

GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska

Počet stran výsledku

20

Strana od-do

802-821

Kód UT WoS článku

000823594700001

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85133700598