Beyond deterrence : Reconceptualizing denial strategies and rethinking their emotional effects

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14230%2F23%3A00131283" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14230/23:00131283 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13523260.2023.2185970" target="_blank" >https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13523260.2023.2185970</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13523260.2023.2185970" target="_blank" >10.1080/13523260.2023.2185970</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Beyond deterrence : Reconceptualizing denial strategies and rethinking their emotional effects

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Contrary to detailed work on deterrence by punishment, Western strategic thought about denial and its effects is conceptually muddled at the expense of effective strategy-making. This article seeks to reconceptualize denial and rethink its emotional effects. It defines denial as a strategy aimed at frustrating the adversary’s military power and proposes four different denial logics: capability elimination, operational paralysis, tactical degradation, and strategic effect reduction. It then turns to the effects through which these denial logics generate favorable consequences, and singles out the emotions of despondency, resignation, fear, and disappointment as the key factors that mediate their impact. The article offers a framework that can help guide further theoretical reflection and empirical research, as well as inform the development of policies and strategies in today’s world.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Beyond deterrence : Reconceptualizing denial strategies and rethinking their emotional effects

Popis výsledku anglicky

Contrary to detailed work on deterrence by punishment, Western strategic thought about denial and its effects is conceptually muddled at the expense of effective strategy-making. This article seeks to reconceptualize denial and rethink its emotional effects. It defines denial as a strategy aimed at frustrating the adversary’s military power and proposes four different denial logics: capability elimination, operational paralysis, tactical degradation, and strategic effect reduction. It then turns to the effects through which these denial logics generate favorable consequences, and singles out the emotions of despondency, resignation, fear, and disappointment as the key factors that mediate their impact. The article offers a framework that can help guide further theoretical reflection and empirical research, as well as inform the development of policies and strategies in today’s world.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50601 - Political science

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Rok uplatnění

2023

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Contemporary Security Policy

ISSN

1352-3260

e-ISSN

1743-8764

Svazek periodika

44

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

2

Stát vydavatele periodika

GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska

Počet stran výsledku

28

Strana od-do

248-275

Kód UT WoS článku

000949565400001

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85150798743