Thematic Uncertainty Visualization Usability ? Basic Methods Comparison

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14310%2F11%3A00059640" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14310/11:00059640 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19475683.2011.625978" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19475683.2011.625978</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19475683.2011.625978" target="_blank" >10.1080/19475683.2011.625978</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Thematic Uncertainty Visualization Usability ? Basic Methods Comparison

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Uncertainty of geographic data and visualization can be viewed from different angles. While conceptual and theoretical base is quite wide, visualization tools and pilot projects are rarer, and there exist only few studies dealing with the user?s `abilityto cope with uncertainty visualization efficiency. The paper introduces two widely used uncertainty visualization methods ? the maps compared and maps combined ? and focuses on the usability issues of these methods. A combination of regular kriging interpolation method and interpolation uncertainty values is used for maps compared while whitening approach is applied for maps combined. During the study we electronically interviewed and tested more than 100 participants with backgrounds in geography or computer science. Both above mentioned methods were tested on three different levels. On the first level the intuitiveness of whitening method is questioned.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Thematic Uncertainty Visualization Usability ? Basic Methods Comparison

Popis výsledku anglicky

Uncertainty of geographic data and visualization can be viewed from different angles. While conceptual and theoretical base is quite wide, visualization tools and pilot projects are rarer, and there exist only few studies dealing with the user?s `abilityto cope with uncertainty visualization efficiency. The paper introduces two widely used uncertainty visualization methods ? the maps compared and maps combined ? and focuses on the usability issues of these methods. A combination of regular kriging interpolation method and interpolation uncertainty values is used for maps compared while whitening approach is applied for maps combined. During the study we electronically interviewed and tested more than 100 participants with backgrounds in geography or computer science. Both above mentioned methods were tested on three different levels. On the first level the intuitiveness of whitening method is questioned.

Druh

J_x - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)

CEP obor

DE - Zemský magnetismus, geodesie, geografie

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

Z - Vyzkumny zamer (s odkazem do CEZ)

Rok uplatnění

2011

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Annals of GIS

ISSN

1947-5683

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

17

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

4

Stát vydavatele periodika

CN - Čínská lidová republika

Počet stran výsledku

11

Strana od-do

253-263

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—