The pros and cons of nucleic acid-amplified immunoassays—a comparative study on the quantitation of prostate-specific antigen with and without rolling circle amplification
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14310%2F24%3A00139615" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14310/24:00139615 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00216-024-05357-y" target="_blank" >https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00216-024-05357-y</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00216-024-05357-y" target="_blank" >10.1007/s00216-024-05357-y</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
The pros and cons of nucleic acid-amplified immunoassays—a comparative study on the quantitation of prostate-specific antigen with and without rolling circle amplification
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
Integrating isothermal nucleic acid amplification strategies into immunoassays can significantly decrease analytical limits of detection (LODs). On the other hand, an amplification step adds time, complication, reagents, and costs to the assay format. To evaluate the pros and cons in the context of heterogeneous multistep immunoassays, we quantified prostate-specific antigen (PSA) with and without rolling circle amplification (RCA). In addition, we compared time-gated (TG) with continuous-wave (CW) photoluminescence (PL) detection using a terbium complex and a fluorescein dye, respectively. For both direct (non-amplified) and amplified assays, TG PL detection provided circa four- to eightfold lower LODs, illustrating the importance of autofluorescence background suppression even for multi-wash assay formats. Amplified assays required an approximately 2.4 h longer assay time but led to almost 100-fold lower LODs down to 1.3 pg/mL of PSA. Implementation of TG-FRET (using a Tb-Cy5.5 donor–acceptor pair) into the RCA immunoassay resulted in a slightly higher LOD (3.0 pg/mL), but the ratiometric detection format provided important benefits, such as higher reproducibility, lower standard deviations, and multiplexing capability. Overall, our direct comparison demonstrated the importance of biological background suppression even in heterogeneous assays and the potential of using isothermal RCA for strongly decreasing analytical LODs, making such assays viable alternatives to conventional enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs).
Název v anglickém jazyce
The pros and cons of nucleic acid-amplified immunoassays—a comparative study on the quantitation of prostate-specific antigen with and without rolling circle amplification
Popis výsledku anglicky
Integrating isothermal nucleic acid amplification strategies into immunoassays can significantly decrease analytical limits of detection (LODs). On the other hand, an amplification step adds time, complication, reagents, and costs to the assay format. To evaluate the pros and cons in the context of heterogeneous multistep immunoassays, we quantified prostate-specific antigen (PSA) with and without rolling circle amplification (RCA). In addition, we compared time-gated (TG) with continuous-wave (CW) photoluminescence (PL) detection using a terbium complex and a fluorescein dye, respectively. For both direct (non-amplified) and amplified assays, TG PL detection provided circa four- to eightfold lower LODs, illustrating the importance of autofluorescence background suppression even for multi-wash assay formats. Amplified assays required an approximately 2.4 h longer assay time but led to almost 100-fold lower LODs down to 1.3 pg/mL of PSA. Implementation of TG-FRET (using a Tb-Cy5.5 donor–acceptor pair) into the RCA immunoassay resulted in a slightly higher LOD (3.0 pg/mL), but the ratiometric detection format provided important benefits, such as higher reproducibility, lower standard deviations, and multiplexing capability. Overall, our direct comparison demonstrated the importance of biological background suppression even in heterogeneous assays and the potential of using isothermal RCA for strongly decreasing analytical LODs, making such assays viable alternatives to conventional enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs).
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
10406 - Analytical chemistry
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
<a href="/cs/project/GA22-27580S" target="_blank" >GA22-27580S: Laserová spektroskopie v imunostanovení a zobrazování s nanometalickými značkami</a><br>
Návaznosti
P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2024
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry
ISSN
1618-2642
e-ISSN
1618-2650
Svazek periodika
416
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
30
Stát vydavatele periodika
DE - Spolková republika Německo
Počet stran výsledku
10
Strana od-do
7285-7294
Kód UT WoS článku
001242267600001
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-85195402714