Porovnání rychlých aproximací Level Set metody pro segmentaci obrazu ve fluorescenční mikroskopii

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14330%2F07%3A00022769" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14330/07:00022769 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

—

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

A Comparison of Fast Level Set-like Algorithms for Image Segmentation in Fluorescence Microscopy

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Image segmentation, one of the fundamental task of image processing, can be accurately solved using the level set framework. However, the computational time demands of the level set methods make them practically useless, especially for segmentation of large threedimensional images. Many approximations have been introduced in recent years to speed up the computation of the level set methods. Although these algorithms provide favourable results, most of them were not properly tested against ground truth images. In this paper we present a comparison of three methods: the Sparse-Field method [1], Deng and Tsui's algorithm [2] and Nilsson and Heyden's algorithm [3]. Our main motivation was to compare these methods on 3D image data acquired using fluorescence microscope, but we suppose that presented results are also valid and applicable to other biomedical images like CT scans, MRI or ultrasound images. We focus on a comparison of the method accuracy, speed and ability to detect several obj

Název v anglickém jazyce

A Comparison of Fast Level Set-like Algorithms for Image Segmentation in Fluorescence Microscopy

Popis výsledku anglicky

Image segmentation, one of the fundamental task of image processing, can be accurately solved using the level set framework. However, the computational time demands of the level set methods make them practically useless, especially for segmentation of large threedimensional images. Many approximations have been introduced in recent years to speed up the computation of the level set methods. Although these algorithms provide favourable results, most of them were not properly tested against ground truth images. In this paper we present a comparison of three methods: the Sparse-Field method [1], Deng and Tsui's algorithm [2] and Nilsson and Heyden's algorithm [3]. Our main motivation was to compare these methods on 3D image data acquired using fluorescence microscope, but we suppose that presented results are also valid and applicable to other biomedical images like CT scans, MRI or ultrasound images. We focus on a comparison of the method accuracy, speed and ability to detect several obj

Druh

D - Stať ve sborníku

CEP obor

IN - Informatika

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

Výsledek vznikl pri realizaci vícero projektů. Více informací v záložce Projekty.

Návaznosti

P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)<br>Z - Vyzkumny zamer (s odkazem do CEZ)

Rok uplatnění

2007

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název statě ve sborníku

Advances in Visual Computing

ISBN

978-3-540-76855-5

ISSN

—

e-ISSN

—

Počet stran výsledku

11

Strana od-do

571-581

Název nakladatele

Spinger-Verlag

Místo vydání

Berlin, Heidelberg

Místo konání akce

Lake Tahoe, Nevada/California

Datum konání akce

26. 11. 2007

Typ akce podle státní příslušnosti

WRD - Celosvětová akce

Kód UT WoS článku

—