On the Credibility of Wireless Sensor Network Simulations: Evaluation of Intrusion Detection System

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14330%2F12%3A00057321" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14330/12:00057321 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

—

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

On the Credibility of Wireless Sensor Network Simulations: Evaluation of Intrusion Detection System

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

In the field of wireless sensor networks, not many schemes are tested on real hardware. System designers usually give preference to simulations since their preparation and execution require significantly less time and money than experiments on real hardware. In this paper, we present a practical research on four open-source simulators, i.e., Castalia, Cooja, MiXiM and WSNet. Recently, using a simple test case, we demonstrated that usage of different simulators results into different evaluation outcomeseven though the simulators are set in the same way, and the same evaluation metric is used - a number of packets received by sensor nodes. We hypothesized possible sources of the differences, but we did not thoroughly examine them. In this paper, we rigorously examine the simulators and present our findings regarding the sources of the differences. Also, we evaluate their impact on the evaluation of a more complex system - the intrusion detection system.

Název v anglickém jazyce

On the Credibility of Wireless Sensor Network Simulations: Evaluation of Intrusion Detection System

Popis výsledku anglicky

In the field of wireless sensor networks, not many schemes are tested on real hardware. System designers usually give preference to simulations since their preparation and execution require significantly less time and money than experiments on real hardware. In this paper, we present a practical research on four open-source simulators, i.e., Castalia, Cooja, MiXiM and WSNet. Recently, using a simple test case, we demonstrated that usage of different simulators results into different evaluation outcomeseven though the simulators are set in the same way, and the same evaluation metric is used - a number of packets received by sensor nodes. We hypothesized possible sources of the differences, but we did not thoroughly examine them. In this paper, we rigorously examine the simulators and present our findings regarding the sources of the differences. Also, we evaluate their impact on the evaluation of a more complex system - the intrusion detection system.

Druh

D - Stať ve sborníku

CEP obor

IN - Informatika

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/GAP202%2F11%2F0422" target="_blank" >GAP202/11/0422: Bezpečnostní protokoly podporující soukromí a detekce průniku v bezdrátových senzorových sítích</a><br>

Návaznosti

P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)<br>S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Rok uplatnění

2012

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název statě ve sborníku

SIMUTOOLS '12: Proceedings of the 5th International ICST Conference on Simulation Tools and Techniques

ISBN

9781450315104

ISSN

—

e-ISSN

—

Počet stran výsledku

10

Strana od-do

75-84

Název nakladatele

ICST

Místo vydání

Belgium

Místo konání akce

Desenzano del Garda, Italy

Datum konání akce

19. 3. 2012

Typ akce podle státní příslušnosti

WRD - Celosvětová akce

Kód UT WoS článku

—