Vše

Co hledáte?

Vše
Projekty
Výsledky výzkumu
Subjekty

Rychlé hledání

  • Projekty podpořené TA ČR
  • Významné projekty
  • Projekty s nejvyšší státní podporou
  • Aktuálně běžící projekty

Chytré vyhledávání

  • Takto najdu konkrétní +slovo
  • Takto z výsledků -slovo zcela vynechám
  • “Takto můžu najít celou frázi”

The effect of two different modes of feedback on lexical development of academic register in ESP/EAP students´ writing

Identifikátory výsledku

  • Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14410%2F19%3A00115674" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14410/19:00115674 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Výsledek na webu

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

Alternativní jazyky

  • Jazyk výsledku

    angličtina

  • Název v původním jazyce

    The effect of two different modes of feedback on lexical development of academic register in ESP/EAP students´ writing

  • Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

    Feedback is considered a powerful tool for developing EFL learners’ writing proficiency and this role might be supported by Sociocultural Theory. This theoretical framework assumes that learning is a social phenomenon, and that human intellectual capacities, including language development, are socially and culturally mediated within the zone of proximal development (Villamil &amp; Guerrero, 2006; Vygotsky, 1978). The current study examines the effect of two modes of multi-draft electronic feedback (e-feedback) on the lexical development of EASP students’ writing using AntWordProfiler (Anthony, 2014). The participants of the study were 65 EASP advanced learners who were divided into two groups. The first group (the teacher group) was provided with multi-draft teacher e-feedback on their subsequent drafts, while the other one (the peer group) was given both peer and teacher e-feedback on their drafts. The study investigates the lexical developments in academic register between pre-test and post-test learner corpora collected in the teacher and peer group, and compares the differences between both groups. The results indicate that the students’ use of academic and specific vocabulary showed development between the pre-test and post-test in both groups, at the expense of less advanced and less specific vocabulary. The findings also show that these lexical developments do not differ between the comparison groups, suggesting that students might equally benefit from peer feedback as they do from teacher feedback.

  • Název v anglickém jazyce

    The effect of two different modes of feedback on lexical development of academic register in ESP/EAP students´ writing

  • Popis výsledku anglicky

    Feedback is considered a powerful tool for developing EFL learners’ writing proficiency and this role might be supported by Sociocultural Theory. This theoretical framework assumes that learning is a social phenomenon, and that human intellectual capacities, including language development, are socially and culturally mediated within the zone of proximal development (Villamil &amp; Guerrero, 2006; Vygotsky, 1978). The current study examines the effect of two modes of multi-draft electronic feedback (e-feedback) on the lexical development of EASP students’ writing using AntWordProfiler (Anthony, 2014). The participants of the study were 65 EASP advanced learners who were divided into two groups. The first group (the teacher group) was provided with multi-draft teacher e-feedback on their subsequent drafts, while the other one (the peer group) was given both peer and teacher e-feedback on their drafts. The study investigates the lexical developments in academic register between pre-test and post-test learner corpora collected in the teacher and peer group, and compares the differences between both groups. The results indicate that the students’ use of academic and specific vocabulary showed development between the pre-test and post-test in both groups, at the expense of less advanced and less specific vocabulary. The findings also show that these lexical developments do not differ between the comparison groups, suggesting that students might equally benefit from peer feedback as they do from teacher feedback.

Klasifikace

  • Druh

    D - Stať ve sborníku

  • CEP obor

  • OECD FORD obor

    50301 - Education, general; including training, pedagogy, didactics [and education systems]

Návaznosti výsledku

  • Projekt

  • Návaznosti

    S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Ostatní

  • Rok uplatnění

    2019

  • Kód důvěrnosti údajů

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku

  • Název statě ve sborníku

    IV.International conference From theory to practice in language for specific purposes

  • ISBN

  • ISSN

    1849-9279

  • e-ISSN

  • Počet stran výsledku

    14

  • Strana od-do

    199-212

  • Název nakladatele

    Association of LSP Teachers at Higher Education Institutions

  • Místo vydání

    Zagreb

  • Místo konání akce

    Zagreb

  • Datum konání akce

    21. 2. 2019

  • Typ akce podle státní příslušnosti

    EUR - Evropská akce

  • Kód UT WoS článku