Use of scenario training in high school self-defence teaching
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14510%2F11%3A00074634" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14510/11:00074634 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
—
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
—
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Use of scenario training in high school self-defence teaching
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
Self-defence is the main part of high school combatives curriculum. Contemporary trend in self-defence training is use of scenario training. Basic principles and methods of creating scenario training are described in the first part of paper. In 2010 ? 2011 High school self-defence project (HSSP) was implemented in three different high schools. Scenario training was integrated into HSSP. In the second part of articles are presented data from scenario training, which was integrated as post-test of students self-defence skills. The main evaluative method of educational outcomes was expert analysis and non-standardised questionnaire. The result of self-defence scenario trainings was ambiguous. The performance of two from three schools was more or less thesame. The successful to unsuccessful defence ratio of the school A was 9:9, 1 result being unclear; in the school B it was 11:9, 1 result being unclear. Only students of the sport grammar school reached markedly better ratio 7:1.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Use of scenario training in high school self-defence teaching
Popis výsledku anglicky
Self-defence is the main part of high school combatives curriculum. Contemporary trend in self-defence training is use of scenario training. Basic principles and methods of creating scenario training are described in the first part of paper. In 2010 ? 2011 High school self-defence project (HSSP) was implemented in three different high schools. Scenario training was integrated into HSSP. In the second part of articles are presented data from scenario training, which was integrated as post-test of students self-defence skills. The main evaluative method of educational outcomes was expert analysis and non-standardised questionnaire. The result of self-defence scenario trainings was ambiguous. The performance of two from three schools was more or less thesame. The successful to unsuccessful defence ratio of the school A was 9:9, 1 result being unclear; in the school B it was 11:9, 1 result being unclear. Only students of the sport grammar school reached markedly better ratio 7:1.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>x</sub> - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)
CEP obor
AK - Sport a aktivity volného času
OECD FORD obor
—
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2011
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Studia sportiva
ISSN
1802-7679
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
2011
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
3
Stát vydavatele periodika
CZ - Česká republika
Počet stran výsledku
6
Strana od-do
339-344
Kód UT WoS článku
—
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
—