Forefoot strike, rear foot strike or running shoes. Does it matter?

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14510%2F19%3A00110846" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14510/19:00110846 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5817/StS2019-1-5" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.5817/StS2019-1-5</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5817/StS2019-1-5" target="_blank" >10.5817/StS2019-1-5</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Forefoot strike, rear foot strike or running shoes. Does it matter?

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

The main aim of this article is to provide some insight into evidence-based data in running. The pre- valence of a rearfoot strike (RFS) pattern is much more usual than a forefoot strike (FFS) even among elite distance runners. There has been significant pressure on runners to change their running style from RFS to FFS in recent times. Usually, this has been justified by the statement that FFS relates to a lower injury rate. Recent studies have shown however, that this statement is probably not true. Different types of strike pattern have an influence on loading different structures of the lower limbs, but the total incidence of running related injury is the same regardless of the type of foot strike pattern. We want to provide not only an objective view on running technique but also an evidence-based view on the choice of running shoes. There are many recommendations to consider when choosing running shoes, especially in running stores, but only a few of them are supported by research. This article is not a meta-analysis but it provides some evidence based information about running styles and running shoes.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Forefoot strike, rear foot strike or running shoes. Does it matter?

Popis výsledku anglicky

The main aim of this article is to provide some insight into evidence-based data in running. The pre- valence of a rearfoot strike (RFS) pattern is much more usual than a forefoot strike (FFS) even among elite distance runners. There has been significant pressure on runners to change their running style from RFS to FFS in recent times. Usually, this has been justified by the statement that FFS relates to a lower injury rate. Recent studies have shown however, that this statement is probably not true. Different types of strike pattern have an influence on loading different structures of the lower limbs, but the total incidence of running related injury is the same regardless of the type of foot strike pattern. We want to provide not only an objective view on running technique but also an evidence-based view on the choice of running shoes. There are many recommendations to consider when choosing running shoes, especially in running stores, but only a few of them are supported by research. This article is not a meta-analysis but it provides some evidence based information about running styles and running shoes.

Druh

J_ost - Ostatní články v recenzovaných periodicích

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

30306 - Sport and fitness sciences

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2019

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Studia Sportiva

ISSN

1802-7679

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

13

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

1

Stát vydavatele periodika

CZ - Česká republika

Počet stran výsledku

6

Strana od-do

49-54

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—