Decentralisation: Pros and Cons (theory and empirical evidence)

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14560%2F14%3A00075815" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14560/14:00075815 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

—

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Decentralisation: Pros and Cons (theory and empirical evidence)

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

The principle of subsidiarity represents the official ?ideology? in Europe. Its meaning is explained in more detail in the European Charter for Local Self-Government. Signatory countries should respect the principles set out in the Charter, for example right to self-government of municipality or region, right to own financial income for municipality or regional budget, etc. This paper has three main goals. First, based on literature review, it discusses selected theoretical arguments for and against subsidiarity/decentralisation. Second, it shows examples of existing evidence about economies of scale in the CEE region and third, it also indicates region specific issues limiting the potential of decentralisation in the conditions of developing countriesin Central and Eastern Europe. The main conclusions of paper are that decentralisation shall be understood as a tool and not as the definite goal. Decentralization cannot be sees as a one-dimensional strategy.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Decentralisation: Pros and Cons (theory and empirical evidence)

Popis výsledku anglicky

The principle of subsidiarity represents the official ?ideology? in Europe. Its meaning is explained in more detail in the European Charter for Local Self-Government. Signatory countries should respect the principles set out in the Charter, for example right to self-government of municipality or region, right to own financial income for municipality or regional budget, etc. This paper has three main goals. First, based on literature review, it discusses selected theoretical arguments for and against subsidiarity/decentralisation. Second, it shows examples of existing evidence about economies of scale in the CEE region and third, it also indicates region specific issues limiting the potential of decentralisation in the conditions of developing countriesin Central and Eastern Europe. The main conclusions of paper are that decentralisation shall be understood as a tool and not as the definite goal. Decentralization cannot be sees as a one-dimensional strategy.

Druh

D - Stať ve sborníku

CEP obor

AE - Řízení, správa a administrativa

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Rok uplatnění

2014

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název statě ve sborníku

Centralization Decentralization Debate Revisited

ISBN

9786054348770

ISSN

—

e-ISSN

—

Počet stran výsledku

22

Strana od-do

97-118

Název nakladatele

Istanbul Policy Center

Místo vydání

Instanbul

Místo konání akce

Instanbul

Datum konání akce

1. 1. 2014

Typ akce podle státní příslušnosti

CST - Celostátní akce

Kód UT WoS článku

—