How can calculation methods affect a common EU target for municipal waste recycling?

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14560%2F18%3A00101881" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14560/18:00101881 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://www.wasteforum.cz/cisla/WF_4_2018.pdf#page=108" target="_blank" >http://www.wasteforum.cz/cisla/WF_4_2018.pdf#page=108</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

How can calculation methods affect a common EU target for municipal waste recycling?

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

The paper discusses municipal waste strategies for approaching the European Union (EU) recycling targets that were set out in the Commission Decision (2011/753/EU) focused on establishing rules and calculation methods for these targets. We analyse the calculation of recycling targets for municipal waste in 2010–2015 by using four calculation methods for the EU member states. We try to assess the differences in interpretations of the EU municipal waste (MW) definitions and the impact that the different recycling rate calculation methods may have on final recycling figures. We discuss significant inconsistencies in the data collection methods as well as interpretations of the definition of MW used to support the decision of the European Parliament from 14 March 2017 claiming that the calculation of recycled MW should be based on one harmonised method that would prevent member states from reporting scrap as recycled waste.

Název v anglickém jazyce

How can calculation methods affect a common EU target for municipal waste recycling?

Popis výsledku anglicky

The paper discusses municipal waste strategies for approaching the European Union (EU) recycling targets that were set out in the Commission Decision (2011/753/EU) focused on establishing rules and calculation methods for these targets. We analyse the calculation of recycling targets for municipal waste in 2010–2015 by using four calculation methods for the EU member states. We try to assess the differences in interpretations of the EU municipal waste (MW) definitions and the impact that the different recycling rate calculation methods may have on final recycling figures. We discuss significant inconsistencies in the data collection methods as well as interpretations of the definition of MW used to support the decision of the European Parliament from 14 March 2017 claiming that the calculation of recycled MW should be based on one harmonised method that would prevent member states from reporting scrap as recycled waste.

Druh

J_SC - Článek v periodiku v databázi SCOPUS

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50204 - Business and management

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/TL01000305" target="_blank" >TL01000305: Analýza potenciálu Jihomoravského kraje ve vztahu k oběhovému hospodářství</a><br>

Návaznosti

P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Rok uplatnění

2018

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Waste forum

ISSN

1804-0195

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

2018

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

4

Stát vydavatele periodika

CZ - Česká republika

Počet stran výsledku

12

Strana od-do

514-525

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85059979942