Rethinking the Relationship between the Study of Religions, Theology and Religious Concerns: A Response to Some Aspects of Wiebe's and Martin's Paper

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216275%3A25210%2F12%3A39895663" target="_blank" >RIV/00216275:25210/12:39895663 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

—

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Rethinking the Relationship between the Study of Religions, Theology and Religious Concerns: A Response to Some Aspects of Wiebe's and Martin's Paper

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

This article deals with relationship between the Religious Studies, Theology and Religious Concerns from the situation of the discipline in Central and Eastern Europe. In the same time it&apos;s the response to article of Luther Martin and Donald Wiebe titled &quot;Religious Studies as a Scientific Discipline: The Persistence of a Delusion&quot;. Both of them are generally disappointed of the late situation of Religious Studies as a field, especially because of religious motivation of scholars considered as ideological way of studies. I claim as they do if science is to stay scientific, it cannot become a &quot;project&quot; to solve the existential questions of a scholar or of the academic community. Whether the study of religions is to protect itselfeffectively from such a fallacy, unlike them I stress it must be wary not only of theology, but as well as of any attempts to changes into a philosophy (of religion). I promote that Religious Studies is &quot;modest cognitive project&quo

Název v anglickém jazyce

Rethinking the Relationship between the Study of Religions, Theology and Religious Concerns: A Response to Some Aspects of Wiebe's and Martin's Paper

Popis výsledku anglicky

This article deals with relationship between the Religious Studies, Theology and Religious Concerns from the situation of the discipline in Central and Eastern Europe. In the same time it&apos;s the response to article of Luther Martin and Donald Wiebe titled &quot;Religious Studies as a Scientific Discipline: The Persistence of a Delusion&quot;. Both of them are generally disappointed of the late situation of Religious Studies as a field, especially because of religious motivation of scholars considered as ideological way of studies. I claim as they do if science is to stay scientific, it cannot become a &quot;project&quot; to solve the existential questions of a scholar or of the academic community. Whether the study of religions is to protect itselfeffectively from such a fallacy, unlike them I stress it must be wary not only of theology, but as well as of any attempts to changes into a philosophy (of religion). I promote that Religious Studies is &quot;modest cognitive project&quo

Druh

J_x - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)

CEP obor

AA - Filosofie a náboženství

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/GAP401%2F10%2F0311" target="_blank" >GAP401/10/0311: Rozvoj religionistiky ve střední a východní Evropě ve 20. stolětí</a><br>

Návaznosti

P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Rok uplatnění

2012

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Religio : Revue pro religionistiku

ISSN

1210-3640

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

19/2012

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

1

Stát vydavatele periodika

CZ - Česká republika

Počet stran výsledku

11

Strana od-do

43-53

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—