Trojí pojetí svobody
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216275%3A25210%2F21%3A39917811" target="_blank" >RIV/00216275:25210/21:39917811 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://www.sav.sk/journals/uploads/02261311filozofia.2020.76.2.3.pdf" target="_blank" >https://www.sav.sk/journals/uploads/02261311filozofia.2020.76.2.3.pdf</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.31577/filozofia.2020.76.2.3" target="_blank" >10.31577/filozofia.2020.76.2.3</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
čeština
Název v původním jazyce
Trojí pojetí svobody
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
Berlin's division of liberty into its positive and negative variants is usually mentioned as a point of reference in the debates about freedom. However, I consider as more fundamental the difference between liberal freedom and freedom based on responsible relations with other people and the surrounding world. In other words, I question the meaning of freedom, which - with a reference to the conception of Ladislav Hejclanek, proponent of the Czech practical philosophy I do not consider to be an elimination of various life bonds, but instead their acceptance, fulfilment, or improvement. However, such binding freedom can also find its ""allies"" in liberalism namely in the so-called liberalism of fear (B. Williams, J. Shklar), which is surprisingly close to Hejdanek's conception and represents at least one of the contemporary currents of liberalism, able to unite with a seemingly opposing tradition. In addition to introducing Hejdanek's conception of freedom, the aim of the paper is also to outline this connection.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Three Concepts of Liberty
Popis výsledku anglicky
Berlin's division of liberty into its positive and negative variants is usually mentioned as a point of reference in the debates about freedom. However, I consider as more fundamental the difference between liberal freedom and freedom based on responsible relations with other people and the surrounding world. In other words, I question the meaning of freedom, which - with a reference to the conception of Ladislav Hejclanek, proponent of the Czech practical philosophy I do not consider to be an elimination of various life bonds, but instead their acceptance, fulfilment, or improvement. However, such binding freedom can also find its ""allies"" in liberalism namely in the so-called liberalism of fear (B. Williams, J. Shklar), which is surprisingly close to Hejdanek's conception and represents at least one of the contemporary currents of liberalism, able to unite with a seemingly opposing tradition. In addition to introducing Hejdanek's conception of freedom, the aim of the paper is also to outline this connection.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
60301 - Philosophy, History and Philosophy of science and technology
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
<a href="/cs/project/EF15_003%2F0000425" target="_blank" >EF15_003/0000425: Centrum pro etiku</a><br>
Návaznosti
P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2021
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Filozofia
ISSN
0046-385X
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
76
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
2
Stát vydavatele periodika
SK - Slovenská republika
Počet stran výsledku
15
Strana od-do
110-124
Kód UT WoS článku
000627455300004
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-85105284507