Decency and Love (One or Two Paths to the Life of Goodness in Gaita's Work?)
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216275%3A25210%2F22%3A39919074" target="_blank" >RIV/00216275:25210/22:39919074 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11406-022-00487-y" target="_blank" >https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11406-022-00487-y</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11406-022-00487-y" target="_blank" >10.1007/s11406-022-00487-y</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Decency and Love (One or Two Paths to the Life of Goodness in Gaita's Work?)
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
This paper traces the distinction between the claims of love and the claims of morality in the work of Raimond Gaita, and disputes it using examples from Gaita's work - particularly his use of ""decency"" in place of morality - which I try to understand better through this scrutiny. I disclose in Gaita's work the tension between highlighting love and praise of decency and I try to show that the tension between love and decency indeed remains present in his writing, but not as a contrariness of claims from both departments. Though they constitute two different claims, their mixture is imaginable and valuable even if, by taking part in it, the sense of both love and decency changes, which, however, might be seen as an opportunity to open new horizons for working both of them into human life.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Decency and Love (One or Two Paths to the Life of Goodness in Gaita's Work?)
Popis výsledku anglicky
This paper traces the distinction between the claims of love and the claims of morality in the work of Raimond Gaita, and disputes it using examples from Gaita's work - particularly his use of ""decency"" in place of morality - which I try to understand better through this scrutiny. I disclose in Gaita's work the tension between highlighting love and praise of decency and I try to show that the tension between love and decency indeed remains present in his writing, but not as a contrariness of claims from both departments. Though they constitute two different claims, their mixture is imaginable and valuable even if, by taking part in it, the sense of both love and decency changes, which, however, might be seen as an opportunity to open new horizons for working both of them into human life.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
60302 - Ethics (except ethics related to specific subfields)
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
<a href="/cs/project/EF15_003%2F0000425" target="_blank" >EF15_003/0000425: Centrum pro etiku</a><br>
Návaznosti
P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2022
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Philosophia
ISSN
0048-3893
e-ISSN
1574-9274
Svazek periodika
50
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
Neuveden
Stát vydavatele periodika
NL - Nizozemsko
Počet stran výsledku
15
Strana od-do
"1879–1893"
Kód UT WoS článku
000766031100002
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
—