Vše

Co hledáte?

Vše
Projekty
Výsledky výzkumu
Subjekty

Rychlé hledání

  • Projekty podpořené TA ČR
  • Významné projekty
  • Projekty s nejvyšší státní podporou
  • Aktuálně běžící projekty

Chytré vyhledávání

  • Takto najdu konkrétní +slovo
  • Takto z výsledků -slovo zcela vynechám
  • “Takto můžu najít celou frázi”

Metternich's League to Preserve Peace and the Conservative Elites' Doubts about the Functionality of the Post-Napoleonic Order

Identifikátory výsledku

  • Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216275%3A25210%2F24%3A39922591" target="_blank" >RIV/00216275:25210/24:39922591 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Výsledek na webu

    <a href="https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/austrian-history-yearbook/article/metternichs-league-to-preserve-peace-and-the-conservative-elites-doubts-about-the-functionality-of-the-postnapoleonic-order/3C3C15C483F631213235C904372F05DC" target="_blank" >https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/austrian-history-yearbook/article/metternichs-league-to-preserve-peace-and-the-conservative-elites-doubts-about-the-functionality-of-the-postnapoleonic-order/3C3C15C483F631213235C904372F05DC</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0067237823000620" target="_blank" >10.1017/S0067237823000620</a>

Alternativní jazyky

  • Jazyk výsledku

    angličtina

  • Název v původním jazyce

    Metternich's League to Preserve Peace and the Conservative Elites' Doubts about the Functionality of the Post-Napoleonic Order

  • Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

    Before 1848 not merely democrats and liberals criticized the post-Napoleonic order for their growing mistrust of its ability to protect the sovereignty of smaller countries and preserve the general peace. The predominantly conservative ruling elite, namely rulers, statesmen, and diplomats, raised the same criticism when the law-breaking and abuse of power made them similarly mistrustful of the state of European politics during the 1830s and 1840s. This became true even for some of the order&apos;s authors like Austrian chancellor Metternich who serves as a prominent example of this mistrust with his project of a league to preserve peace in Europe in August 1840. Metternich, who helped to create this order in 1815, found it defective and in need of improvement only a quarter of a century later. He certainly did not want to create a completely new international order and law of nations as some liberals and democrats desired at that time, but his idea was still, in a certain sense, revolutionary since its realization would have fundamentally modified the pillars on which the order had been founded at the end of the Napoleonic Wars.

  • Název v anglickém jazyce

    Metternich's League to Preserve Peace and the Conservative Elites' Doubts about the Functionality of the Post-Napoleonic Order

  • Popis výsledku anglicky

    Before 1848 not merely democrats and liberals criticized the post-Napoleonic order for their growing mistrust of its ability to protect the sovereignty of smaller countries and preserve the general peace. The predominantly conservative ruling elite, namely rulers, statesmen, and diplomats, raised the same criticism when the law-breaking and abuse of power made them similarly mistrustful of the state of European politics during the 1830s and 1840s. This became true even for some of the order&apos;s authors like Austrian chancellor Metternich who serves as a prominent example of this mistrust with his project of a league to preserve peace in Europe in August 1840. Metternich, who helped to create this order in 1815, found it defective and in need of improvement only a quarter of a century later. He certainly did not want to create a completely new international order and law of nations as some liberals and democrats desired at that time, but his idea was still, in a certain sense, revolutionary since its realization would have fundamentally modified the pillars on which the order had been founded at the end of the Napoleonic Wars.

Klasifikace

  • Druh

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

  • CEP obor

  • OECD FORD obor

    60101 - History (history of science and technology to be 6.3, history of specific sciences to be under the respective headings)

Návaznosti výsledku

  • Projekt

    <a href="/cs/project/GA21-02257S" target="_blank" >GA21-02257S: Německá reakce na nejistotu v mezinárodních vztazích: Němci a Evropa mezi psaným právem a právem silnějšího 1839–1853</a><br>

  • Návaznosti

    P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Ostatní

  • Rok uplatnění

    2024

  • Kód důvěrnosti údajů

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku

  • Název periodika

    Austrian History Yearbook

  • ISSN

    0067-2378

  • e-ISSN

    1558-5255

  • Svazek periodika

    55

  • Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

    1

  • Stát vydavatele periodika

    US - Spojené státy americké

  • Počet stran výsledku

    16

  • Strana od-do

    87-102

  • Kód UT WoS článku

    001354412700009

  • EID výsledku v databázi Scopus