Vše

Co hledáte?

Vše
Projekty
Výsledky výzkumu
Subjekty

Rychlé hledání

  • Projekty podpořené TA ČR
  • Významné projekty
  • Projekty s nejvyšší státní podporou
  • Aktuálně běžící projekty

Chytré vyhledávání

  • Takto najdu konkrétní +slovo
  • Takto z výsledků -slovo zcela vynechám
  • “Takto můžu najít celou frázi”

Metternich’s Peace Management, 1840–48: Anachronism or Vision?

Identifikátory výsledku

  • Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F49777513%3A23330%2F22%3A43963876" target="_blank" >RIV/49777513:23330/22:43963876 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Výsledek na webu

    <a href="https://www.webofscience.com/wos/woscc/full-record/WOS:000784531500001" target="_blank" >https://www.webofscience.com/wos/woscc/full-record/WOS:000784531500001</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0067237822000029" target="_blank" >10.1017/S0067237822000029</a>

Alternativní jazyky

  • Jazyk výsledku

    angličtina

  • Název v původním jazyce

    Metternich’s Peace Management, 1840–48: Anachronism or Vision?

  • Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

    Austrian chancellor Metternich’s Europeanism is often disputed. It has been claimed that he strove only to strengthen Austrian power within the German Confederation and to establish Austrian hegemony in Central Europe, with European interests and the Concert of only secondary concern. The objective of this paper is to analyze Metternich’s opinions and acts during selected European crises and events between 1840 and 1848, arguing that his approach to resolving them or dealing with their consequences shows that during this period his primary objective was to maintain European peace. He wanted to achieve this by demonstrating the moral consensus of, ideally, all the great powers by abating tense nationalist sentiments, calling for the observance of international agreements and the respect of rights, adopting preventive measures, and warning against or drawing attention to the possible negative consequences of the crises for peace in Europe. Metternich’s attempt at preserving European peace at all costs was mainly a result of his personal experience of revolution and almost a quarter-century of warfare with France. By the 1840s, however, Metternich’s style of peace management was rejected as anachronistic, resulting in several military conflicts in subsequent years. Considering the events of the last century that led to European integration, however, his Europeanism deserves a more forgiving evaluation.

  • Název v anglickém jazyce

    Metternich’s Peace Management, 1840–48: Anachronism or Vision?

  • Popis výsledku anglicky

    Austrian chancellor Metternich’s Europeanism is often disputed. It has been claimed that he strove only to strengthen Austrian power within the German Confederation and to establish Austrian hegemony in Central Europe, with European interests and the Concert of only secondary concern. The objective of this paper is to analyze Metternich’s opinions and acts during selected European crises and events between 1840 and 1848, arguing that his approach to resolving them or dealing with their consequences shows that during this period his primary objective was to maintain European peace. He wanted to achieve this by demonstrating the moral consensus of, ideally, all the great powers by abating tense nationalist sentiments, calling for the observance of international agreements and the respect of rights, adopting preventive measures, and warning against or drawing attention to the possible negative consequences of the crises for peace in Europe. Metternich’s attempt at preserving European peace at all costs was mainly a result of his personal experience of revolution and almost a quarter-century of warfare with France. By the 1840s, however, Metternich’s style of peace management was rejected as anachronistic, resulting in several military conflicts in subsequent years. Considering the events of the last century that led to European integration, however, his Europeanism deserves a more forgiving evaluation.

Klasifikace

  • Druh

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

  • CEP obor

  • OECD FORD obor

    60101 - History (history of science and technology to be 6.3, history of specific sciences to be under the respective headings)

Návaznosti výsledku

  • Projekt

  • Návaznosti

    I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Ostatní

  • Rok uplatnění

    2022

  • Kód důvěrnosti údajů

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku

  • Název periodika

    Austrian History Yearbook

  • ISSN

    0067-2378

  • e-ISSN

    1558-5255

  • Svazek periodika

    53

  • Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

    May 2022

  • Stát vydavatele periodika

    GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska

  • Počet stran výsledku

    15

  • Strana od-do

    75-89

  • Kód UT WoS článku

    000784531500001

  • EID výsledku v databázi Scopus