Comparison of Pressurised Fluid and Ultrasonic Extraction Methods for Analysis of Plant Antioxidants and their Antioxidant Capacity

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216275%3A25310%2F10%3A39881939" target="_blank" >RIV/00216275:25310/10:39881939 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

—

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Comparison of Pressurised Fluid and Ultrasonic Extraction Methods for Analysis of Plant Antioxidants and their Antioxidant Capacity

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

The analytical method based on the high-per formance liquid chromatography coupled with UV detection (HPLC/UV) for determination of selected antioxidants (i.e., esculetin, scopoletin, 7-hydroxycoumarine, rutin, xanthotoxin,5-methoxypsoralen and quercetin) in plant material was developed. Pressurised fluid extraction (PFE) and ultrasonic extraction (USE) methods for the isolation of these compounds from ten real plant samples were used. Both extraction methods were optimised and compared to each other. For the proposed HPLC/UV method the LOQ values (limit of quantification) in the range from 22.7 (xanthotoxin) to 97.2 ng mL-1 (rutin) were obtained. For all extracts the antioxidant capacity based on the reduction of free 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl radical (DPPH) was also determined. Results ranged from 82.04 to 94.43 % of DPPH radical inhibition for PFE method and from 76.01 to 89.94 % in the case of USE method.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Comparison of Pressurised Fluid and Ultrasonic Extraction Methods for Analysis of Plant Antioxidants and their Antioxidant Capacity

Popis výsledku anglicky

The analytical method based on the high-per formance liquid chromatography coupled with UV detection (HPLC/UV) for determination of selected antioxidants (i.e., esculetin, scopoletin, 7-hydroxycoumarine, rutin, xanthotoxin,5-methoxypsoralen and quercetin) in plant material was developed. Pressurised fluid extraction (PFE) and ultrasonic extraction (USE) methods for the isolation of these compounds from ten real plant samples were used. Both extraction methods were optimised and compared to each other. For the proposed HPLC/UV method the LOQ values (limit of quantification) in the range from 22.7 (xanthotoxin) to 97.2 ng mL-1 (rutin) were obtained. For all extracts the antioxidant capacity based on the reduction of free 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl radical (DPPH) was also determined. Results ranged from 82.04 to 94.43 % of DPPH radical inhibition for PFE method and from 76.01 to 89.94 % in the case of USE method.

Druh

J_x - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)

CEP obor

CB - Analytická chemie, separace

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/GA203%2F08%2F1536" target="_blank" >GA203/08/1536: Progresívní metody v chemické, potravinářské a klinické analýze</a><br>

Návaznosti

P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)<br>Z - Vyzkumny zamer (s odkazem do CEZ)

Rok uplatnění

2010

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Central European Journal of Chemistry

ISSN

1895-1066

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

8

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

1

Stát vydavatele periodika

PL - Polská republika

Počet stran výsledku

9

Strana od-do

—

Kód UT WoS článku

000276548100012

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—