Subjective and Objective Metrics for Selfevaluation of Public Administration Organization
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216275%3A25410%2F11%3A39892122" target="_blank" >RIV/00216275:25410/11:39892122 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
—
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
—
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Subjective and Objective Metrics for Selfevaluation of Public Administration Organization
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
Application of methods for monitoring organization output and for production quality assessment is considered a necessity, if an organization wants to reach good output in a long-term. However, public administration organizations have certain delay in application of these methods of monitoring and assessment of quality. There is an effort to increase the quality of services provided, but it lacks financial stimulus, which is apparent in production sphere. Process approach and application of measuring processes is supported mainly by decision of superior authorities. That is the reason why first-time usage of quality measuring methods is very often formal. Methods recommend using subjective and objective indicators, of course with accent on objective indicators and objective evaluation processes. The article is engaged in meaning and ways to use subjective and objective metrics for self-evaluation of public administration companies; it documents meaning and usability of various evaluati
Název v anglickém jazyce
Subjective and Objective Metrics for Selfevaluation of Public Administration Organization
Popis výsledku anglicky
Application of methods for monitoring organization output and for production quality assessment is considered a necessity, if an organization wants to reach good output in a long-term. However, public administration organizations have certain delay in application of these methods of monitoring and assessment of quality. There is an effort to increase the quality of services provided, but it lacks financial stimulus, which is apparent in production sphere. Process approach and application of measuring processes is supported mainly by decision of superior authorities. That is the reason why first-time usage of quality measuring methods is very often formal. Methods recommend using subjective and objective indicators, of course with accent on objective indicators and objective evaluation processes. The article is engaged in meaning and ways to use subjective and objective metrics for self-evaluation of public administration companies; it documents meaning and usability of various evaluati
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>x</sub> - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)
CEP obor
AE - Řízení, správa a administrativa
OECD FORD obor
—
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
<a href="/cs/project/GA402%2F09%2F0219" target="_blank" >GA402/09/0219: Použitelnost softwaru pro podporu rozhodování při řešení prostorově orientovaných problémů</a><br>
Návaznosti
P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)<br>S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2011
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
International Journal of Mathematical Models and Methods in Applied Sciences
ISSN
1998-0140
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
Neuveden
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
5
Stát vydavatele periodika
US - Spojené státy americké
Počet stran výsledku
11
Strana od-do
48-58
Kód UT WoS článku
—
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
—