EVALUATING BUSINESS PERFORMANCE USING THE BALANCED SCORECARD METHOD
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216275%3A25410%2F15%3A39899679" target="_blank" >RIV/00216275:25410/15:39899679 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
—
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
—
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
EVALUATING BUSINESS PERFORMANCE USING THE BALANCED SCORECARD METHOD
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
The main objective of this paper is to use modern approaches for evaluating the performance and competitiveness of a company with regard to a dynamic business environment. The evaluation method used is the Balanced Scorecard, which was designed in 1993 by the authors Kaplan and Norton as a system of balanced perspectives (based on finances, customers, internal processes and growth). Currently, however, the original Balanced Scorecard method exhibits certain deficiencies in its approach to measuring business performance and achieving a competitive advantage, especially in terms of an overly simplistic unidirectional causality in the strategic map, the same weight assigned to individual scales or the failure to distinguish cause and effect in time. Content included in the case study is a comparison of a classical and dynamic model of a Balanced Scorecard in the Czech business environment, particularly in companies providing banking services. A properly drawn up scorecard should contain a
Název v anglickém jazyce
EVALUATING BUSINESS PERFORMANCE USING THE BALANCED SCORECARD METHOD
Popis výsledku anglicky
The main objective of this paper is to use modern approaches for evaluating the performance and competitiveness of a company with regard to a dynamic business environment. The evaluation method used is the Balanced Scorecard, which was designed in 1993 by the authors Kaplan and Norton as a system of balanced perspectives (based on finances, customers, internal processes and growth). Currently, however, the original Balanced Scorecard method exhibits certain deficiencies in its approach to measuring business performance and achieving a competitive advantage, especially in terms of an overly simplistic unidirectional causality in the strategic map, the same weight assigned to individual scales or the failure to distinguish cause and effect in time. Content included in the case study is a comparison of a classical and dynamic model of a Balanced Scorecard in the Czech business environment, particularly in companies providing banking services. A properly drawn up scorecard should contain a
Klasifikace
Druh
D - Stať ve sborníku
CEP obor
AE - Řízení, správa a administrativa
OECD FORD obor
—
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2015
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název statě ve sborníku
SGEM2015: Conference Proceedings. Book 2. Vol. 2
ISBN
978-619-7105-47-6
ISSN
2367-5659
e-ISSN
—
Počet stran výsledku
8
Strana od-do
177-184
Název nakladatele
STEF92 Technology Ltd.
Místo vydání
Sofie
Místo konání akce
Albena
Datum konání akce
26. 8. 2015
Typ akce podle státní příslušnosti
EUR - Evropská akce
Kód UT WoS článku
—