Vše

Co hledáte?

Vše
Projekty
Výsledky výzkumu
Subjekty

Rychlé hledání

  • Projekty podpořené TA ČR
  • Významné projekty
  • Projekty s nejvyšší státní podporou
  • Aktuálně běžící projekty

Chytré vyhledávání

  • Takto najdu konkrétní +slovo
  • Takto z výsledků -slovo zcela vynechám
  • “Takto můžu najít celou frázi”

Integrating TOPSIS with interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy cognitive maps for effective group decision making

Identifikátory výsledku

  • Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216275%3A25410%2F19%3A39914848" target="_blank" >RIV/00216275:25410/19:39914848 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Výsledek na webu

    <a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020025519301288" target="_blank" >https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020025519301288</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2019.02.035" target="_blank" >10.1016/j.ins.2019.02.035</a>

Alternativní jazyky

  • Jazyk výsledku

    angličtina

  • Název v původním jazyce

    Integrating TOPSIS with interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy cognitive maps for effective group decision making

  • Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

    Many real-life situations require ranking alternative decisions with respect to multiple criteria. The problem becomes more complicated when the knowledge of the considered criteria is vague and unreliable. In order to cope with the vagueness, the values of criteria have to be represented in an approximated way. To overcome the lack of reliability, many experts can be involved in the decision process and thus cooperatively elaborate more credible decisions. However, as it turns out, experts are usually unable to provide plausible information on interactions between vague decision criteria. Since those interactions substantially affect the ranking of alternative decisions, they should be taken into account in the decision process. To effectively cope with that issue, we propose a novel multi-criteria group decision-making method that integrates TOPSIS (technique for order of preference by similarity to ideal solution) with IVIFCMs (interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy cognitive maps), a tool that is able to model interactions among highly imprecise criteria. We illustrate the application of the proposed IVIFCM-TOPSIS to the supplier selection task. Finally, we present the advantages derived from the use of our method compared to competitive approaches known from the literature. In particular, we show that our method is more consistent than the existing state-of-the-art methods used to solve the addressed decision problem. (C) 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

  • Název v anglickém jazyce

    Integrating TOPSIS with interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy cognitive maps for effective group decision making

  • Popis výsledku anglicky

    Many real-life situations require ranking alternative decisions with respect to multiple criteria. The problem becomes more complicated when the knowledge of the considered criteria is vague and unreliable. In order to cope with the vagueness, the values of criteria have to be represented in an approximated way. To overcome the lack of reliability, many experts can be involved in the decision process and thus cooperatively elaborate more credible decisions. However, as it turns out, experts are usually unable to provide plausible information on interactions between vague decision criteria. Since those interactions substantially affect the ranking of alternative decisions, they should be taken into account in the decision process. To effectively cope with that issue, we propose a novel multi-criteria group decision-making method that integrates TOPSIS (technique for order of preference by similarity to ideal solution) with IVIFCMs (interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy cognitive maps), a tool that is able to model interactions among highly imprecise criteria. We illustrate the application of the proposed IVIFCM-TOPSIS to the supplier selection task. Finally, we present the advantages derived from the use of our method compared to competitive approaches known from the literature. In particular, we show that our method is more consistent than the existing state-of-the-art methods used to solve the addressed decision problem. (C) 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Klasifikace

  • Druh

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

  • CEP obor

  • OECD FORD obor

    10201 - Computer sciences, information science, bioinformathics (hardware development to be 2.2, social aspect to be 5.8)

Návaznosti výsledku

  • Projekt

    <a href="/cs/project/GA16-19590S" target="_blank" >GA16-19590S: Analýza témat a sentimentu vícenásobných textových zdrojů pro finanční rozhodování podniků</a><br>

  • Návaznosti

    P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Ostatní

  • Rok uplatnění

    2019

  • Kód důvěrnosti údajů

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku

  • Název periodika

    Information Sciences

  • ISSN

    0020-0255

  • e-ISSN

  • Svazek periodika

    485

  • Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

    June

  • Stát vydavatele periodika

    US - Spojené státy americké

  • Počet stran výsledku

    19

  • Strana od-do

    394-412

  • Kód UT WoS článku

    000463121600022

  • EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

    2-s2.0-85061664222