THE PERFORMANCE OF THREE PAIN INTENSITY SCALES AND THEIR PREFERENCES AMONG CZECH WOMEN WITH ACUTE POSTOPERATIVE PAIN
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216275%3A25520%2F15%3A39899925" target="_blank" >RIV/00216275:25520/15:39899925 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="http://periodika.osu.cz/cejnm/dok/2015-03/19-mandysova-kadleckova.pdf" target="_blank" >http://periodika.osu.cz/cejnm/dok/2015-03/19-mandysova-kadleckova.pdf</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.15452/CEJNM.2015.06.0019" target="_blank" >10.15452/CEJNM.2015.06.0019</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
THE PERFORMANCE OF THREE PAIN INTENSITY SCALES AND THEIR PREFERENCES AMONG CZECH WOMEN WITH ACUTE POSTOPERATIVE PAIN
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
Aim: The first aim was to compare the performance of three pain intensity scales, the combined Visual Analogue Scale / Numerical Rating Scale (VAS/NRS), NRS, and Faces Pain Scale - Revised (FPS-R), in Czech women in the Obstetrics & Gynaecology IntensiveCare Unit. The second aim was to compare the women's overall pain scale preference rankings and preference rankings by education level and age. Design: The design was cross-sectional. Methods: Seventy-four women evaluated their acute postoperative painusing the three pain scales and subsequently ranked them according to ease of responding. The data were described and analysed using descriptive statistics and the Spearman rank order correlation coefficient. Results: Spearman correlations ranged from 0.905 (p < 0.001) between the VAS/NRS and the FPS-R to 0.945 (p < 0.001) between the VAS/NRS and the NRS. As for overall preference, the NRS and the FPS-R were ranked first (n = 32; 43% in both cases). Conclusion: Correlations across all th
Název v anglickém jazyce
THE PERFORMANCE OF THREE PAIN INTENSITY SCALES AND THEIR PREFERENCES AMONG CZECH WOMEN WITH ACUTE POSTOPERATIVE PAIN
Popis výsledku anglicky
Aim: The first aim was to compare the performance of three pain intensity scales, the combined Visual Analogue Scale / Numerical Rating Scale (VAS/NRS), NRS, and Faces Pain Scale - Revised (FPS-R), in Czech women in the Obstetrics & Gynaecology IntensiveCare Unit. The second aim was to compare the women's overall pain scale preference rankings and preference rankings by education level and age. Design: The design was cross-sectional. Methods: Seventy-four women evaluated their acute postoperative painusing the three pain scales and subsequently ranked them according to ease of responding. The data were described and analysed using descriptive statistics and the Spearman rank order correlation coefficient. Results: Spearman correlations ranged from 0.905 (p < 0.001) between the VAS/NRS and the FPS-R to 0.945 (p < 0.001) between the VAS/NRS and the NRS. As for overall preference, the NRS and the FPS-R were ranked first (n = 32; 43% in both cases). Conclusion: Correlations across all th
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>x</sub> - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)
CEP obor
FP - Ostatní lékařské obory
OECD FORD obor
—
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2015
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Central European Journal of Nursing and Midwifery
ISSN
2336-3517
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
6
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
3
Stát vydavatele periodika
CZ - Česká republika
Počet stran výsledku
8
Strana od-do
298-305
Kód UT WoS článku
—
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
—