Risk of malnutrition assessment in hospitalised adults: A scoping review of existing instruments

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216275%3A25520%2F22%3A39918819" target="_blank" >RIV/00216275:25520/22:39918819 - isvavai.cz</a>

Nalezeny alternativní kódy

RIV/00216275:25520/23:39918819

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jocn.16470" target="_blank" >https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jocn.16470</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jocn.16470" target="_blank" >10.1111/jocn.16470</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Risk of malnutrition assessment in hospitalised adults: A scoping review of existing instruments

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Aims and objectives The aim of this study was to find tools for screening the risk of malnutrition in adult hospitalised patients, evaluate their key characteristics including selected psychometric properties and propose the most appropriate tools for nursing practice. Background A large number of existing tools for nutritional screening make it difficult to be aware of all the possibilities and especially to select the optimal tool. Design The research methodology was designed as secondary research using a scoping review search to map and compare existing tools for assessing the risk of malnutrition in hospitalised adults. Methods The analysis focused on the selected psychometric properties of the instruments (sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value) and key characteristics relevant to the selection of an appropriate instrument. This study follows the PRISMA-ScR Checklist. Results The review included 27 publications containing 17 tools. The best sensitivity (57%-100%) and specificity (76%-96%) were achieved by the Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST) and the Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 (NRS 2002). Minimal Eating Observation and Nutrition Form-Version II (MEONF-II) has solid sensitivity (up to 73%), specificity (88%) and high positive predictive values (81%-82%). Conclusions The MUST, NRS 2002 and MEONF-II showed satisfactory psychometric properties. MEONF-II and MUST are able to assess risk without weighing the patient. The Hand Grip Strength (HGS) assessment can be recommended to detect reductions in muscle strength. Relevance to clinical practice We recommend the MUST, NRS 2002 and MEONF-II tools for use in clinical practice, as they have the best psychometric properties and are user-friendly. The HGS, which proved to be related to the length of hospital stay (LOS) and used as an indicator of protein-energy malnutrition in obese patients, may be a useful complementary tool. For nursing practice, we recommend selecting a tool with respect to the specifics of a particular workplace.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Risk of malnutrition assessment in hospitalised adults: A scoping review of existing instruments

Popis výsledku anglicky

Aims and objectives The aim of this study was to find tools for screening the risk of malnutrition in adult hospitalised patients, evaluate their key characteristics including selected psychometric properties and propose the most appropriate tools for nursing practice. Background A large number of existing tools for nutritional screening make it difficult to be aware of all the possibilities and especially to select the optimal tool. Design The research methodology was designed as secondary research using a scoping review search to map and compare existing tools for assessing the risk of malnutrition in hospitalised adults. Methods The analysis focused on the selected psychometric properties of the instruments (sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value) and key characteristics relevant to the selection of an appropriate instrument. This study follows the PRISMA-ScR Checklist. Results The review included 27 publications containing 17 tools. The best sensitivity (57%-100%) and specificity (76%-96%) were achieved by the Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST) and the Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 (NRS 2002). Minimal Eating Observation and Nutrition Form-Version II (MEONF-II) has solid sensitivity (up to 73%), specificity (88%) and high positive predictive values (81%-82%). Conclusions The MUST, NRS 2002 and MEONF-II showed satisfactory psychometric properties. MEONF-II and MUST are able to assess risk without weighing the patient. The Hand Grip Strength (HGS) assessment can be recommended to detect reductions in muscle strength. Relevance to clinical practice We recommend the MUST, NRS 2002 and MEONF-II tools for use in clinical practice, as they have the best psychometric properties and are user-friendly. The HGS, which proved to be related to the length of hospital stay (LOS) and used as an indicator of protein-energy malnutrition in obese patients, may be a useful complementary tool. For nursing practice, we recommend selecting a tool with respect to the specifics of a particular workplace.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

30307 - Nursing

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Rok uplatnění

2022

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Journal of Clinical Nursing

ISSN

0962-1067

e-ISSN

1365-2702

Svazek periodika

Neuveden

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

Neuvedeno

Stát vydavatele periodika

US - Spojené státy americké

Počet stran výsledku

15

Strana od-do

nestrankovano

Kód UT WoS článku

000829186900001

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85134582055