Vše

Co hledáte?

Vše
Projekty
Výsledky výzkumu
Subjekty

Rychlé hledání

  • Projekty podpořené TA ČR
  • Významné projekty
  • Projekty s nejvyšší státní podporou
  • Aktuálně běžící projekty

Chytré vyhledávání

  • Takto najdu konkrétní +slovo
  • Takto z výsledků -slovo zcela vynechám
  • “Takto můžu najít celou frázi”

Plug-in Hybrids vs Battery Powered Vehicles - Optimisation Model for Charging Infrastructure at a University Campus

Identifikátory výsledku

  • Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216305%3A26210%2F22%3APU145510" target="_blank" >RIV/00216305:26210/22:PU145510 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Výsledek na webu

    <a href="https://aidic.it/cet/22/94/175.pdf" target="_blank" >https://aidic.it/cet/22/94/175.pdf</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3303/CET2294175" target="_blank" >10.3303/CET2294175</a>

Alternativní jazyky

  • Jazyk výsledku

    angličtina

  • Název v původním jazyce

    Plug-in Hybrids vs Battery Powered Vehicles - Optimisation Model for Charging Infrastructure at a University Campus

  • Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

    University campuses, as well as other workplaces, provide great opportunity for electric vehicle (EV) charging. A simulation model was created in GAMS (General Algebraic Modeling System) for the optimization study concerning charging infrastructure at the Faculty of Mechanical Engineering at Brno University of Technology. The study was conducted for 20 plug-in hybrid electric vehicles (PHEVs) and 20 battery electric vehicles (BEVs). This assumption was based on the similar sales of PHEVs and BEVs in the EU in 2021. The PHEVs could only be charged at alternating current (AC) chargers (using the EV’s built-in chargers) while the BEVs could be charged at both the AC chargers and the high-power DC (direct current) chargers. The AC chargers are much cheaper to install but because of the relatively small power of the BEV’s built-in chargers the charging at AC chargers takes a long time. As the university employees have flexible working hours, varying arrival times of the EVs as well as the varying duration of their stay on the campus was considered. The state of charge (SOC) of the EV’s batteries at the time of arrival on the campus was also considered. For the considered sets of parameters 3 DC chargers and 6 AC chargers covered 96 % of the total demand. A replacement of one DC charger with two AC chargers led to the decrease of coverage to 95 % but with significant reduction of capital costs.

  • Název v anglickém jazyce

    Plug-in Hybrids vs Battery Powered Vehicles - Optimisation Model for Charging Infrastructure at a University Campus

  • Popis výsledku anglicky

    University campuses, as well as other workplaces, provide great opportunity for electric vehicle (EV) charging. A simulation model was created in GAMS (General Algebraic Modeling System) for the optimization study concerning charging infrastructure at the Faculty of Mechanical Engineering at Brno University of Technology. The study was conducted for 20 plug-in hybrid electric vehicles (PHEVs) and 20 battery electric vehicles (BEVs). This assumption was based on the similar sales of PHEVs and BEVs in the EU in 2021. The PHEVs could only be charged at alternating current (AC) chargers (using the EV’s built-in chargers) while the BEVs could be charged at both the AC chargers and the high-power DC (direct current) chargers. The AC chargers are much cheaper to install but because of the relatively small power of the BEV’s built-in chargers the charging at AC chargers takes a long time. As the university employees have flexible working hours, varying arrival times of the EVs as well as the varying duration of their stay on the campus was considered. The state of charge (SOC) of the EV’s batteries at the time of arrival on the campus was also considered. For the considered sets of parameters 3 DC chargers and 6 AC chargers covered 96 % of the total demand. A replacement of one DC charger with two AC chargers led to the decrease of coverage to 95 % but with significant reduction of capital costs.

Klasifikace

  • Druh

    J<sub>SC</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi SCOPUS

  • CEP obor

  • OECD FORD obor

    10102 - Applied mathematics

Návaznosti výsledku

  • Projekt

    <a href="/cs/project/EF16_026%2F0008392" target="_blank" >EF16_026/0008392: Výpočtové simulace pro efektivní nízkoemisní energetiku</a><br>

  • Návaznosti

    P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Ostatní

  • Rok uplatnění

    2022

  • Kód důvěrnosti údajů

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku

  • Název periodika

    Chemical Engineering Transactions

  • ISSN

    2283-9216

  • e-ISSN

  • Svazek periodika

    94

  • Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

    1

  • Stát vydavatele periodika

    IT - Italská republika

  • Počet stran výsledku

    6

  • Strana od-do

    1051-1056

  • Kód UT WoS článku

  • EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

    2-s2.0-85139524579