COMPARISON OF SACCHARIFICATION METHODS FOR BIOTECHNOLOGICAL UTILIZATION OF WHEAT BRAN

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216305%3A26310%2F23%3APU149653" target="_blank" >RIV/00216305:26310/23:PU149653 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://www.scientific-publications.net/en/article/1002652/" target="_blank" >https://www.scientific-publications.net/en/article/1002652/</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

COMPARISON OF SACCHARIFICATION METHODS FOR BIOTECHNOLOGICAL UTILIZATION OF WHEAT BRAN

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

This study compares various methods used for the hydrolysis of lignocellulosic waste materials in terms of sugar yield and the content of inhibiting substances. Wheat bran was used as the lignocellulosic material, and the following hydrolysis methods were investigated: one-step alkaline hydrolysis, repeated alkaline hydrolysis, acid hydrolysis, and a combination of these methods with enzymatic hydrolysis. The combination of acid and enzymatic hydrolysis yielded the highest sugar yield, with a concentration of sugars in the hydrolyzate reaching up to 60 g/L and a yield of around 90%. The total concentration of phenolic substances, which can act as inhibitors during further biotechnological processing of the hydrolyzate, was approximately 270 mg/L GAE when using acid hydrolysis combined with enzymatic hydrolysis.

Název v anglickém jazyce

COMPARISON OF SACCHARIFICATION METHODS FOR BIOTECHNOLOGICAL UTILIZATION OF WHEAT BRAN

Popis výsledku anglicky

This study compares various methods used for the hydrolysis of lignocellulosic waste materials in terms of sugar yield and the content of inhibiting substances. Wheat bran was used as the lignocellulosic material, and the following hydrolysis methods were investigated: one-step alkaline hydrolysis, repeated alkaline hydrolysis, acid hydrolysis, and a combination of these methods with enzymatic hydrolysis. The combination of acid and enzymatic hydrolysis yielded the highest sugar yield, with a concentration of sugars in the hydrolyzate reaching up to 60 g/L and a yield of around 90%. The total concentration of phenolic substances, which can act as inhibitors during further biotechnological processing of the hydrolyzate, was approximately 270 mg/L GAE when using acid hydrolysis combined with enzymatic hydrolysis.

Druh

J_ost - Ostatní články v recenzovaných periodicích

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

10400 - Chemical sciences

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/FW02020135" target="_blank" >FW02020135: Ověření konceptu biorafinerie pro zpracování otrub</a><br>

Návaznosti

P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Rok uplatnění

2023

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Agriculture & Food

ISSN

1314-8591

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

neuveden

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

11

Stát vydavatele periodika

BG - Bulharská republika

Počet stran výsledku

7

Strana od-do

96-102

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—