Qualitative Models of Bankruptcy Proceedings using Multi-Expert Complex Decision Making
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216305%3A26510%2F17%3APU125417" target="_blank" >RIV/00216305:26510/17:PU125417 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
—
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
—
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Qualitative Models of Bankruptcy Proceedings using Multi-Expert Complex Decision Making
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
There is a broad spectrum of BP (Bankruptcy Proceedings) models. They are unique, partially subjective, inconsistent, vague and multidimensional. It is therefore often prohibitively difficult to analyse them using numerical quantifiers. Oversimplified or highly specific BPs are sometimes obtained. Their practical applicability is therefore (very) limited. A qualitative heuristic is described using just trends; i.e. There are just three trend / qualitative values used to quantify variables and their derivatives: plus/increasing; zero/constant; negative/decreasing. There are qualitative BP knowledge items in equationless forms such as heuristics. For example – if standard of ensured justice is increasing then level of creditors bullying is decreasing.. It means that not just simple trends but higher derivatives can be incorporated into a model if they are known. No quantitative quantifiers, e.g. numbers, are used in this paper. The solution of a trend model M(X) is a set S of scenarios where X is the s
Název v anglickém jazyce
Qualitative Models of Bankruptcy Proceedings using Multi-Expert Complex Decision Making
Popis výsledku anglicky
There is a broad spectrum of BP (Bankruptcy Proceedings) models. They are unique, partially subjective, inconsistent, vague and multidimensional. It is therefore often prohibitively difficult to analyse them using numerical quantifiers. Oversimplified or highly specific BPs are sometimes obtained. Their practical applicability is therefore (very) limited. A qualitative heuristic is described using just trends; i.e. There are just three trend / qualitative values used to quantify variables and their derivatives: plus/increasing; zero/constant; negative/decreasing. There are qualitative BP knowledge items in equationless forms such as heuristics. For example – if standard of ensured justice is increasing then level of creditors bullying is decreasing.. It means that not just simple trends but higher derivatives can be incorporated into a model if they are known. No quantitative quantifiers, e.g. numbers, are used in this paper. The solution of a trend model M(X) is a set S of scenarios where X is the s
Klasifikace
Druh
O - Ostatní výsledky
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
50201 - Economic Theory
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2017
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů