(In)effective communication about social responsibility? Examining large European businesses in the Czech Republic
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216305%3A26510%2F24%3APU152118" target="_blank" >RIV/00216305:26510/24:PU152118 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://journals.vilniustech.lt/index.php/BMEE/article/view/21414" target="_blank" >https://journals.vilniustech.lt/index.php/BMEE/article/view/21414</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/bmee.2024.21414" target="_blank" >10.3846/bmee.2024.21414</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
(In)effective communication about social responsibility? Examining large European businesses in the Czech Republic
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
Purpose – Businesses are expected to be socially responsible by engaging in Corpo-rate social responsibility (CSR) and even the Creation of shared values (CSV). The aim of this contribution is to critically explore whether large European businesses operating in Czechia, recognized as social responsibility leaders, effectively communicate CSR as opposed to their competitors.Research methodology – A case study with three stages was conducted. First, 35 large Europe-an businesses were identified, which repeatedly ranked among the TOP 25 Czech companies with the highest social responsibility BpS synthetic index, and their 15 competitors. Second, an Internet search and content analysis of Websites of these 50 companies was performed to categorize and assess how they report about their socially responsible behaviors. Third, lead-ing Czech disinformation websites were examined for evidence of tacit cooperation with the disinformation scene in the form of support via advertising. Findings – The study revealed that large European businesses, recognized as social respon-sibility leaders, communicate extensively about their social responsibility. However, the ef-fectiveness of such communications is controversial. In addition, a significant part of these businesses were found to be tacitly associated with disinformation platforms, which are com-pletely at odds with with basic social responsibility concepts. Research limitations – The qualitative nature of the case study does not allow direct gener-alizations. Practical implications – The visualization of the juxtaposed results via comparative and com-plementary tables leads to pioneering propositions about the interest and lack of maturity regarding social responsibility, very diverse degrees of effectiveness of the communications, and even several alleged leaders failing in their efforts.Originality/Value– It i
Název v anglickém jazyce
(In)effective communication about social responsibility? Examining large European businesses in the Czech Republic
Popis výsledku anglicky
Purpose – Businesses are expected to be socially responsible by engaging in Corpo-rate social responsibility (CSR) and even the Creation of shared values (CSV). The aim of this contribution is to critically explore whether large European businesses operating in Czechia, recognized as social responsibility leaders, effectively communicate CSR as opposed to their competitors.Research methodology – A case study with three stages was conducted. First, 35 large Europe-an businesses were identified, which repeatedly ranked among the TOP 25 Czech companies with the highest social responsibility BpS synthetic index, and their 15 competitors. Second, an Internet search and content analysis of Websites of these 50 companies was performed to categorize and assess how they report about their socially responsible behaviors. Third, lead-ing Czech disinformation websites were examined for evidence of tacit cooperation with the disinformation scene in the form of support via advertising. Findings – The study revealed that large European businesses, recognized as social respon-sibility leaders, communicate extensively about their social responsibility. However, the ef-fectiveness of such communications is controversial. In addition, a significant part of these businesses were found to be tacitly associated with disinformation platforms, which are com-pletely at odds with with basic social responsibility concepts. Research limitations – The qualitative nature of the case study does not allow direct gener-alizations. Practical implications – The visualization of the juxtaposed results via comparative and com-plementary tables leads to pioneering propositions about the interest and lack of maturity regarding social responsibility, very diverse degrees of effectiveness of the communications, and even several alleged leaders failing in their efforts.Originality/Value– It i
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
50204 - Business and management
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2024
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Business Management and Economics Engineering
ISSN
2669-249X
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
22
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
2
Stát vydavatele periodika
LT - Litevská republika
Počet stran výsledku
26
Strana od-do
214-239
Kód UT WoS článku
001313821800001
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-85205092514