Withholding and Withdrawing Life-sustaining Therapy in the Surgical Intensive Care Unit
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00843989%3A_____%2F06%3A00014085" target="_blank" >RIV/00843989:_____/06:00014085 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
—
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
—
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Withholding and Withdrawing Life-sustaining Therapy in the Surgical Intensive Care Unit
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
The decision to limit life-sustaining treatment in the surgical ICU should be based on widely held ethical principles such as autonomy, beneficence, nonmaleficence, and distributive justice. The withholding and withdrawing of life support is frequent insurgical critically ill patients. Empirical research into the use of do-not-resuscitate orders suggest that there is no broad agreement on which patients should not be resuscitated [1]. It is strongly recommended that research be conducted to improve end-of-life care [2]. The withholding and withdrawing of life support was frequent in surgical critically ill patients. In the study no trends were found in life-sustaining therapy in the following period. The proportion of deaths preceded by the withdrawalor by the withholding of life support ranges from 0% to 79%, in this study it was 54.4%. Intensive care management of patients with malignancy raises controversy [3]. In the group of patients who died and had a malignant tumour, the prop
Název v anglickém jazyce
Withholding and Withdrawing Life-sustaining Therapy in the Surgical Intensive Care Unit
Popis výsledku anglicky
The decision to limit life-sustaining treatment in the surgical ICU should be based on widely held ethical principles such as autonomy, beneficence, nonmaleficence, and distributive justice. The withholding and withdrawing of life support is frequent insurgical critically ill patients. Empirical research into the use of do-not-resuscitate orders suggest that there is no broad agreement on which patients should not be resuscitated [1]. It is strongly recommended that research be conducted to improve end-of-life care [2]. The withholding and withdrawing of life support was frequent in surgical critically ill patients. In the study no trends were found in life-sustaining therapy in the following period. The proportion of deaths preceded by the withdrawalor by the withholding of life support ranges from 0% to 79%, in this study it was 54.4%. Intensive care management of patients with malignancy raises controversy [3]. In the group of patients who died and had a malignant tumour, the prop
Klasifikace
Druh
D - Stať ve sborníku
CEP obor
FJ - Chirurgie včetně transplantologie
OECD FORD obor
—
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
V - Vyzkumna aktivita podporovana z jinych verejnych zdroju
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2006
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název statě ve sborníku
XXXV World Congress of the International College of Surgeons
ISBN
8875873046
ISSN
—
e-ISSN
—
Počet stran výsledku
3
Strana od-do
—
Název nakladatele
Medimond
Místo vydání
Bologna
Místo konání akce
Pattaya (Thailand)
Datum konání akce
1. 1. 2006
Typ akce podle státní příslušnosti
WRD - Celosvětová akce
Kód UT WoS článku
000245373300035