Sonolysis in prevention of brain infarction during carotid endarterectomy and stenting (SONOBUSTER): a randomized, controlled trial
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00843989%3A_____%2F16%3AE0105650" target="_blank" >RIV/00843989:_____/16:E0105650 - isvavai.cz</a>
Nalezeny alternativní kódy
RIV/61989592:15110/16:33155427 RIV/61989592:15120/16:33155427 RIV/61383082:_____/16:00000239 RIV/61988987:17110/16:A210288O
Výsledek na webu
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehv492" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehv492</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehv492" target="_blank" >10.1093/eurheartj/ehv492</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Sonolysis in prevention of brain infarction during carotid endarterectomy and stenting (SONOBUSTER): a randomized, controlled trial
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
AIMS: Previous case series have detected silent brain infarctions in as many as one-third of patients after carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and in up to two-thirds of patients after carotid angioplasty and stenting (CAS). Sonolysis employs ultrasound to facilitate disruption of thrombi and has been shown to be safe and effective for improving long-term outcomes following acute stroke. Here, we examined whether intraoperative sonolysis alters the risk of new brain ischaemic lesions during CEA or CAS. METHODS AND RESULTS: All consecutive patients with internal carotid stenosis ?70% indicated for CEA/CAS were screened in this prospective study. Patients were allocated randomly to sonolysis and control groups. Neurological examination, cognitive function tests, and brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were conducted before intervention and at 24 and 30 days post-surgery. Of the 487 screened patients, 121 (87 males; mean age, 66.65 ± 7.17 years) were allocated to the sonolysis group and 121 (75; 66.02 ± 8.11 years) to the control group. New brain ischaemic lesions on post-procedure MRI were significantly less frequent in the sonolysis group than in the control group (31.4% of patients vs. 47.1%; P = 0.018). Sonolysis and CEA were identified as independent predictors of reduced brain ischaemic risk [sonolysis: odds ratio (OR) = 0.450 (0.215-0.942), P = 0.034 and CEA: OR = 0.208 (0.087-0.495), P < 0.001]. Stroke or transient ischaemic attack occurred in one sonolysis patient and three control patients (P = 0.372). No significant group differences were found in post-intervention cognitive test scores (P > 0.3). CONCLUSION: This study provides Class II evidence that sonolysis during CEA or CAS reduces the risk of new brain ischaemic lesions.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Sonolysis in prevention of brain infarction during carotid endarterectomy and stenting (SONOBUSTER): a randomized, controlled trial
Popis výsledku anglicky
AIMS: Previous case series have detected silent brain infarctions in as many as one-third of patients after carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and in up to two-thirds of patients after carotid angioplasty and stenting (CAS). Sonolysis employs ultrasound to facilitate disruption of thrombi and has been shown to be safe and effective for improving long-term outcomes following acute stroke. Here, we examined whether intraoperative sonolysis alters the risk of new brain ischaemic lesions during CEA or CAS. METHODS AND RESULTS: All consecutive patients with internal carotid stenosis ?70% indicated for CEA/CAS were screened in this prospective study. Patients were allocated randomly to sonolysis and control groups. Neurological examination, cognitive function tests, and brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were conducted before intervention and at 24 and 30 days post-surgery. Of the 487 screened patients, 121 (87 males; mean age, 66.65 ± 7.17 years) were allocated to the sonolysis group and 121 (75; 66.02 ± 8.11 years) to the control group. New brain ischaemic lesions on post-procedure MRI were significantly less frequent in the sonolysis group than in the control group (31.4% of patients vs. 47.1%; P = 0.018). Sonolysis and CEA were identified as independent predictors of reduced brain ischaemic risk [sonolysis: odds ratio (OR) = 0.450 (0.215-0.942), P = 0.034 and CEA: OR = 0.208 (0.087-0.495), P < 0.001]. Stroke or transient ischaemic attack occurred in one sonolysis patient and three control patients (P = 0.372). No significant group differences were found in post-intervention cognitive test scores (P > 0.3). CONCLUSION: This study provides Class II evidence that sonolysis during CEA or CAS reduces the risk of new brain ischaemic lesions.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>x</sub> - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)
CEP obor
FH - Neurologie, neurochirurgie, neurovědy
OECD FORD obor
—
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
<a href="/cs/project/NT11386" target="_blank" >NT11386: Snížení rizika vzniku symptomatického a klinicky němého mozkového infarktu v průběhu karotické endarterektomie a karotického stentingu pomocí aktivace fibrinolytického systému kontinuálním transkraniálním dopplerovským monitoringem</a><br>
Návaznosti
P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2016
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
European Heart Journal
ISSN
0195-668X
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
37
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
n. 40
Stát vydavatele periodika
GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska
Počet stran výsledku
7
Strana od-do
"p. 3096-3102"
Kód UT WoS článku
—
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
—