Clinical value of ALK and CD30 expression in mature systemic T cell lymphomas: analysis from the Czech Lymphoma Study Group database (NIHIL)
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00843989%3A_____%2F22%3AE0109504" target="_blank" >RIV/00843989:_____/22:E0109504 - isvavai.cz</a>
Nalezeny alternativní kódy
RIV/65269705:_____/22:00076111 RIV/00064173:_____/22:43922837 RIV/00098892:_____/22:10157343 RIV/00064165:_____/22:10437293 a 7 dalších
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00277-022-04759-1" target="_blank" >https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00277-022-04759-1</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00277-022-04759-1" target="_blank" >10.1007/s00277-022-04759-1</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Clinical value of ALK and CD30 expression in mature systemic T cell lymphomas: analysis from the Czech Lymphoma Study Group database (NIHIL)
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
Mature T cell lymphomas (MTCLs) have worse prognosis, and in contrast to B cell lymphomas, there is no universal marker like CD20 with exception of ALK and CD30, which are present in proportion of MTCL only. Up to now, ALK is traditionally associated with good prognosis in ALCLs, and there are some evidences that CD30-positive T cell or B cell lymphomas have better prognosis. In our retrospective, population-based analysis, we analyzed the real clinical value of ALK and CD30 in the most frequent MTCL subtypes. Between 2000 and 2017, we identified 732 patients with newly diagnosed ALCL, AITL, or PTCL-NOS. Among them, 207 ALCL patients were with known ALK, whereas 61 AITL and 238 PTCL-NOS with known CD30 expression. There were 69/207 (33.3%) ALK + ALCLs, who displayed better 5-year PFS (65.6% vs. 36.2%) (p .001) and 5-year OS (71.5% vs. 45.9%) (p .002) compared to ALK - ; ALK + patients were significantly younger (median 48 vs. 60 years; p < 0.001). For patients ? 60 years, 5-year PFS (38.5% vs. 31.2%) and 5-year OS (38.5% vs. 39.6%) were similar between ALK + vs. ALK - patients. For AITL and PTCL-NOS, there were 44/61 (72.1%) and 120/238 (50.4%) CD30 + samples, and difference in CD30 expression was significant (p .02). AITL patients had 5-year OS of 43.8% vs. 55.7% (p 0.848) and 5-year PFS of 36.7% vs. 29.4% (p .624) for CD30 + vs. CD30 - patients, whereas PTCL-NOS had 5-year OS of 35.7% vs. 34.3% (p .318) and 5-year PFS of 29.3% vs. 22.5% (p.114) for CD30 + vs. CD30 - cases. We conclude that ALK in ALCLs (? 60 years) and CD30 expression in PCTL-NOS and AITL have only limited prognostic value.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Clinical value of ALK and CD30 expression in mature systemic T cell lymphomas: analysis from the Czech Lymphoma Study Group database (NIHIL)
Popis výsledku anglicky
Mature T cell lymphomas (MTCLs) have worse prognosis, and in contrast to B cell lymphomas, there is no universal marker like CD20 with exception of ALK and CD30, which are present in proportion of MTCL only. Up to now, ALK is traditionally associated with good prognosis in ALCLs, and there are some evidences that CD30-positive T cell or B cell lymphomas have better prognosis. In our retrospective, population-based analysis, we analyzed the real clinical value of ALK and CD30 in the most frequent MTCL subtypes. Between 2000 and 2017, we identified 732 patients with newly diagnosed ALCL, AITL, or PTCL-NOS. Among them, 207 ALCL patients were with known ALK, whereas 61 AITL and 238 PTCL-NOS with known CD30 expression. There were 69/207 (33.3%) ALK + ALCLs, who displayed better 5-year PFS (65.6% vs. 36.2%) (p .001) and 5-year OS (71.5% vs. 45.9%) (p .002) compared to ALK - ; ALK + patients were significantly younger (median 48 vs. 60 years; p < 0.001). For patients ? 60 years, 5-year PFS (38.5% vs. 31.2%) and 5-year OS (38.5% vs. 39.6%) were similar between ALK + vs. ALK - patients. For AITL and PTCL-NOS, there were 44/61 (72.1%) and 120/238 (50.4%) CD30 + samples, and difference in CD30 expression was significant (p .02). AITL patients had 5-year OS of 43.8% vs. 55.7% (p 0.848) and 5-year PFS of 36.7% vs. 29.4% (p .624) for CD30 + vs. CD30 - patients, whereas PTCL-NOS had 5-year OS of 35.7% vs. 34.3% (p .318) and 5-year PFS of 29.3% vs. 22.5% (p.114) for CD30 + vs. CD30 - cases. We conclude that ALK in ALCLs (? 60 years) and CD30 expression in PCTL-NOS and AITL have only limited prognostic value.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
30205 - Hematology
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
<a href="/cs/project/NU21-03-00411" target="_blank" >NU21-03-00411: Časné rozpoznání faktorů spojených s agresivním chováním Non-Hodgkinova lymfomu</a><br>
Návaznosti
V - Vyzkumna aktivita podporovana z jinych verejnych zdroju
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2022
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Annals of hematology
ISSN
0939-5555
e-ISSN
1432-0584
Svazek periodika
101
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
4
Stát vydavatele periodika
DE - Spolková republika Německo
Počet stran výsledku
10
Strana od-do
789-798
Kód UT WoS článku
000745380700001
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-85123300836