Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis of the Somatosensory Organization Test, Berg Balance Scale, and Fall Efficacy Scale - International for predicting falls in discharged stroke patients

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00843989%3A_____%2F22%3AE0109678" target="_blank" >RIV/00843989:_____/22:E0109678 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/15/9181" target="_blank" >https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/15/9181</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19159181" target="_blank" >10.3390/ijerph19159181</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis of the Somatosensory Organization Test, Berg Balance Scale, and Fall Efficacy Scale - International for predicting falls in discharged stroke patients

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Background: Although fall prevention in patients after stroke is crucial, the clinical validity of fall risk assessment tools is underresearched in this population. The study aim was to determine the cut-off scores and clinical validity of the Sensory Organization Test (SOT), the Berg Balance Scale (BBS), and the Fall Efficacy Scale–International (FES-I) in patients after stroke. Methods: In this prospective cross-sectional study, we analyzed data for patients admitted to a rehabilitation unit after stroke from 2018 through 2021. Participants underwent SOT, BBS, and FES-I pre-discharge, and the fall incidence was recorded for 6 months. We used an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) to calculate predictive values. Results: Of 84 included patients (median age 68.5 (interquartile range 67–71) years), 32 (38.1%) suffered a fall. All three tests were significantly predictive of fall risk. Optimal cut-off scores were 60 points for SOT (AUC 0.686), 35 and 42 points for BBS (AUC 0.661 and 0.618, respectively), and 27 and 29 points for FES-I (AUC 0.685 and 0.677, respectively). Conclusions: Optimal cut-off scores for SOT, BBS, and FES-I were determined for patients at risk for falls after a stroke, which all three tools classified with a good discriminatory ability.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis of the Somatosensory Organization Test, Berg Balance Scale, and Fall Efficacy Scale - International for predicting falls in discharged stroke patients

Popis výsledku anglicky

Background: Although fall prevention in patients after stroke is crucial, the clinical validity of fall risk assessment tools is underresearched in this population. The study aim was to determine the cut-off scores and clinical validity of the Sensory Organization Test (SOT), the Berg Balance Scale (BBS), and the Fall Efficacy Scale–International (FES-I) in patients after stroke. Methods: In this prospective cross-sectional study, we analyzed data for patients admitted to a rehabilitation unit after stroke from 2018 through 2021. Participants underwent SOT, BBS, and FES-I pre-discharge, and the fall incidence was recorded for 6 months. We used an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) to calculate predictive values. Results: Of 84 included patients (median age 68.5 (interquartile range 67–71) years), 32 (38.1%) suffered a fall. All three tests were significantly predictive of fall risk. Optimal cut-off scores were 60 points for SOT (AUC 0.686), 35 and 42 points for BBS (AUC 0.661 and 0.618, respectively), and 27 and 29 points for FES-I (AUC 0.685 and 0.677, respectively). Conclusions: Optimal cut-off scores for SOT, BBS, and FES-I were determined for patients at risk for falls after a stroke, which all three tools classified with a good discriminatory ability.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

30307 - Nursing

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

V - Vyzkumna aktivita podporovana z jinych verejnych zdroju

Rok uplatnění

2022

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

International journal of environmental research and public health

ISSN

1661-7827

e-ISSN

1660-4601

Svazek periodika

19

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

15

Stát vydavatele periodika

CH - Švýcarská konfederace

Počet stran výsledku

12

Strana od-do

1-12

Kód UT WoS článku

000840257300001

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85136342472