Vše

Co hledáte?

Vše
Projekty
Výsledky výzkumu
Subjekty

Rychlé hledání

  • Projekty podpořené TA ČR
  • Významné projekty
  • Projekty s nejvyšší státní podporou
  • Aktuálně běžící projekty

Chytré vyhledávání

  • Takto najdu konkrétní +slovo
  • Takto z výsledků -slovo zcela vynechám
  • “Takto můžu najít celou frázi”

Radicality and safety of mediastinal lymphadenectomy in lung resection: a comparative analysis of uniportal thoracoscopic, multiportal thoracoscopic, and thoracotomy approaches

Identifikátory výsledku

  • Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00843989%3A_____%2F23%3AE0110564" target="_blank" >RIV/00843989:_____/23:E0110564 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Nalezeny alternativní kódy

    RIV/61988987:17110/23:A2402N2E RIV/71009396:_____/23:N0000011

  • Výsledek na webu

    <a href="https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00464-023-10476-1" target="_blank" >https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00464-023-10476-1</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-023-10476-1" target="_blank" >10.1007/s00464-023-10476-1</a>

Alternativní jazyky

  • Jazyk výsledku

    angličtina

  • Název v původním jazyce

    Radicality and safety of mediastinal lymphadenectomy in lung resection: a comparative analysis of uniportal thoracoscopic, multiportal thoracoscopic, and thoracotomy approaches

  • Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

    Background: Lung cancer poses a significant challenge with high mortality rates. Minimally invasive surgical approaches, including the uniportal thoracoscopic technique, offer potential benefits in terms of recovery and patient compliance. This study focuses on evaluating the radicality of mediastinal lymphadenectomy during uniportal thoracoscopic lung resection, specifically assessing the reachability of established lymphatic stations. Methods: A comparative study was conducted at the University Hospital Ostrava from January 2015 to July 2022, focusing on the evaluation of radicality in mediastinal lymphadenectomy across three patient subgroups: uniportal thoracoscopic approach, multiportal thoracoscopic approach, and thoracotomy approach. The study implemented the routine identification and excision of 8 lymph node stations from the respective hemithorax to assess the radicality of lymph node harvesting. Results: A total of 428 patients were enrolled and evaluated. No significant differences were observed in the number of lymph nodes removed between the subgroups. The mean number of lymph nodes removed was 6.50 in the left hemithorax and 6.49 in the right hemithorax. The 30-day postoperative morbidity rate for the entire patient population was 27.3%, with 17.5% experiencing minor complications and 6.5% experiencing major complications. Statistically significant differences were observed in major complications between the uniportal approach and the thoracotomy approach (3.5% vs 12.0%, p = 0.002). The overall mortality rate in the study population was 3%, with a statistically significant difference in mortality between the uniportal and multiportal approaches (1.0% vs 6.4%, p = 0.020). Conclusions: The uniportal approach demonstrated comparable accessibility and lymph node yield to multiportal and thoracotomy techniques. It is equivalent to established methods in terms of postoperative complications, with fewer major complications compared to thoracotomy. While o...

  • Název v anglickém jazyce

    Radicality and safety of mediastinal lymphadenectomy in lung resection: a comparative analysis of uniportal thoracoscopic, multiportal thoracoscopic, and thoracotomy approaches

  • Popis výsledku anglicky

    Background: Lung cancer poses a significant challenge with high mortality rates. Minimally invasive surgical approaches, including the uniportal thoracoscopic technique, offer potential benefits in terms of recovery and patient compliance. This study focuses on evaluating the radicality of mediastinal lymphadenectomy during uniportal thoracoscopic lung resection, specifically assessing the reachability of established lymphatic stations. Methods: A comparative study was conducted at the University Hospital Ostrava from January 2015 to July 2022, focusing on the evaluation of radicality in mediastinal lymphadenectomy across three patient subgroups: uniportal thoracoscopic approach, multiportal thoracoscopic approach, and thoracotomy approach. The study implemented the routine identification and excision of 8 lymph node stations from the respective hemithorax to assess the radicality of lymph node harvesting. Results: A total of 428 patients were enrolled and evaluated. No significant differences were observed in the number of lymph nodes removed between the subgroups. The mean number of lymph nodes removed was 6.50 in the left hemithorax and 6.49 in the right hemithorax. The 30-day postoperative morbidity rate for the entire patient population was 27.3%, with 17.5% experiencing minor complications and 6.5% experiencing major complications. Statistically significant differences were observed in major complications between the uniportal approach and the thoracotomy approach (3.5% vs 12.0%, p = 0.002). The overall mortality rate in the study population was 3%, with a statistically significant difference in mortality between the uniportal and multiportal approaches (1.0% vs 6.4%, p = 0.020). Conclusions: The uniportal approach demonstrated comparable accessibility and lymph node yield to multiportal and thoracotomy techniques. It is equivalent to established methods in terms of postoperative complications, with fewer major complications compared to thoracotomy. While o...

Klasifikace

  • Druh

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

  • CEP obor

  • OECD FORD obor

    30212 - Surgery

Návaznosti výsledku

  • Projekt

  • Návaznosti

    V - Vyzkumna aktivita podporovana z jinych verejnych zdroju

Ostatní

  • Rok uplatnění

    2023

  • Kód důvěrnosti údajů

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku

  • Název periodika

    Surgical endoscopy

  • ISSN

    0930-2794

  • e-ISSN

    1432-2218

  • Svazek periodika

    37

  • Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

    12

  • Stát vydavatele periodika

    DE - Spolková republika Německo

  • Počet stran výsledku

    9

  • Strana od-do

    9208-9216

  • Kód UT WoS článku

    001085805500001

  • EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

    2-s2.0-85174482926