Robotic-assisted mediastinal lymphadenectomy in lung cancer: a narrative review
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00843989%3A_____%2F25%3AE0111729" target="_blank" >RIV/00843989:_____/25:E0111729 - isvavai.cz</a>
Nalezeny alternativní kódy
RIV/61988987:17110/25:A2603D7M
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11701-025-02392-4" target="_blank" >https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11701-025-02392-4</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11701-025-02392-4" target="_blank" >10.1007/s11701-025-02392-4</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Robotic-assisted mediastinal lymphadenectomy in lung cancer: a narrative review
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
The objective of this study is to undertake a narrative review of the oncological adequacy of mediastinal lymphadenectomy performed via robot-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) in comparison with video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) and thoracotomy for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The focus of the review is on lymph node yield, nodal station dissection, and nodal upstaging rates. A narrative review of literature published in the last decade was conducted using PubMed, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases. Studies examining mediastinal lymphadenectomy outcomes for RATS, VATS, or thoracotomy were included in the discussion. The analysis of 19 studies from diverse geographical regions showed that in six out of nine comparative studies, RATS demonstrated superior lymph node retrieval compared to VATS, with statistically significant differences. RATS achieved comparable or superior nodal station dissection rates and showed particular advantages in upstaging from clinical N0 to pathological N2 status. Additionally, RATS demonstrated favourable perioperative outcomes with reduced morbidity and mortality rates compared to conventional approaches. RATS represents a reliable and oncologically sound approach to mediastinal lymphadenectomy, with potential advantages over conventional techniques. Its enhanced visualization and precision make it an increasingly utilised option for NSCLC treatment in centres with robotic capabilities.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Robotic-assisted mediastinal lymphadenectomy in lung cancer: a narrative review
Popis výsledku anglicky
The objective of this study is to undertake a narrative review of the oncological adequacy of mediastinal lymphadenectomy performed via robot-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) in comparison with video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) and thoracotomy for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The focus of the review is on lymph node yield, nodal station dissection, and nodal upstaging rates. A narrative review of literature published in the last decade was conducted using PubMed, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases. Studies examining mediastinal lymphadenectomy outcomes for RATS, VATS, or thoracotomy were included in the discussion. The analysis of 19 studies from diverse geographical regions showed that in six out of nine comparative studies, RATS demonstrated superior lymph node retrieval compared to VATS, with statistically significant differences. RATS achieved comparable or superior nodal station dissection rates and showed particular advantages in upstaging from clinical N0 to pathological N2 status. Additionally, RATS demonstrated favourable perioperative outcomes with reduced morbidity and mortality rates compared to conventional approaches. RATS represents a reliable and oncologically sound approach to mediastinal lymphadenectomy, with potential advantages over conventional techniques. Its enhanced visualization and precision make it an increasingly utilised option for NSCLC treatment in centres with robotic capabilities.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
30212 - Surgery
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
V - Vyzkumna aktivita podporovana z jinych verejnych zdroju
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2025
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Journal of robotic surgery
ISSN
1863-2483
e-ISSN
1863-2491
Svazek periodika
19
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
article 263
Stát vydavatele periodika
GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska
Počet stran výsledku
9
Strana od-do
1-9
Kód UT WoS článku
001502922900002
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-105007222403