Czech Pension Reforms and Their Background

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F04274644%3A_____%2F17%3A%230000294" target="_blank" >RIV/04274644:_____/17:#0000294 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.21008/j.0239-9415.2016.073.19" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.21008/j.0239-9415.2016.073.19</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.21008/j.0239-9415.2016.073.19" target="_blank" >10.21008/j.0239-9415.2016.073.19</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Czech Pension Reforms and Their Background

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Czechoslovak old-age pensions were heavily earnings-related. The 1996 reform confirmed the trend to the flat-rate pensions. The Executive Team for the preparation of the reform (2005) analysed the reform concepts of individual political parties, mainly by the modelling of expenditures and receipts, not by their systemic analysis. They blew away the NDC scheme, recommended by the World Bank to us, with inappropriate parameters. Later the lobbyists Expert Advisory Forum (2010) concentrated on the support of „diversification“, aiming at the introduction of mandatory pension savings. Under the influence of different political and economic interests the Government decided for the „voluntary“ opt-out + addon, its successful realization was made impossible basically by the very existence of, in a sort of way, a strong supplementary pension insurance and by not permitting the use of life insurance sales model in the new „retirement savings“ scheme. Today no political party struggles for a paradigm pension ref

Název v anglickém jazyce

Czech Pension Reforms and Their Background

Popis výsledku anglicky

Czechoslovak old-age pensions were heavily earnings-related. The 1996 reform confirmed the trend to the flat-rate pensions. The Executive Team for the preparation of the reform (2005) analysed the reform concepts of individual political parties, mainly by the modelling of expenditures and receipts, not by their systemic analysis. They blew away the NDC scheme, recommended by the World Bank to us, with inappropriate parameters. Later the lobbyists Expert Advisory Forum (2010) concentrated on the support of „diversification“, aiming at the introduction of mandatory pension savings. Under the influence of different political and economic interests the Government decided for the „voluntary“ opt-out + addon, its successful realization was made impossible basically by the very existence of, in a sort of way, a strong supplementary pension insurance and by not permitting the use of life insurance sales model in the new „retirement savings“ scheme. Today no political party struggles for a paradigm pension ref

Druh

J_ost - Ostatní články v recenzovaných periodicích

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50200 - Economics and Business

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Rok uplatnění

2017

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Zeszyty Naukowe Politechniki Poznańskiej, Organizacja i Zarządzanie

ISSN

0239-9415

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

73

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

3

Stát vydavatele periodika

PL - Polská republika

Počet stran výsledku

14

Strana od-do

289-302

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—