Comparison of a 1 t and a 55 t container when storing spelt grain in mild climate of the Czech Republic
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F25328859%3A_____%2F19%3AN0000014" target="_blank" >RIV/25328859:_____/19:N0000014 - isvavai.cz</a>
Nalezeny alternativní kódy
RIV/00027031:_____/19:N0000072
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://agronomy.emu.ee/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/AR2019_Vol17No6_Bradna.pdf#abstract-7102" target="_blank" >https://agronomy.emu.ee/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/AR2019_Vol17No6_Bradna.pdf#abstract-7102</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.15159/ar.19.200" target="_blank" >10.15159/ar.19.200</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Comparison of a 1 t and a 55 t container when storing spelt grain in mild climate of the Czech Republic
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
Maintaining a suitable microclimate inside the storage space is the most significant factor in maintaining good quality of stored grain for small farmers. This article is aimed at evaluating the influence of outdoor climatic conditions on the storage conditions, specifically the temperature of stored grain in two storage containers. One structure was a 4×6 m cylindrical container (55 t capacity) with a steel wire mesh wall lined with a textile shell. Spelt grain (Triticum spelta) was also stored simultaneously at the same location in a fabric intermediate bulk container (FIBC) bag with maximum capacity of 1 t. Neither structure was mechanically aerated. Grain moisture and temperature were monitored during the spring and start of the summer period of the year 2017 because of the biggest differences between the night and day temperatures. For monitoring of the grain microbiological changes samples were taken for laboratory tests during the whole experiment. Grain quality parameters measured during storage included the bulk density, crude protein, falling number, germination, gluten content, sedimentation index and contamination by mycotoxins. Monitored outdoor environment parameters were temperature, dew point and relative humidity. Results showed a strong dependence of the stored material temperature on the outside temperature in the case of FIBC bags (coefficient of determination R2 = 0.927), whereas the dependence was weaker in the larger structure (R2 = 0.625). Mycotoxins monitored during the period were below the detection limit in both cases. © 2019, Eesti Pollumajandusulikool. All rights reserved.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Comparison of a 1 t and a 55 t container when storing spelt grain in mild climate of the Czech Republic
Popis výsledku anglicky
Maintaining a suitable microclimate inside the storage space is the most significant factor in maintaining good quality of stored grain for small farmers. This article is aimed at evaluating the influence of outdoor climatic conditions on the storage conditions, specifically the temperature of stored grain in two storage containers. One structure was a 4×6 m cylindrical container (55 t capacity) with a steel wire mesh wall lined with a textile shell. Spelt grain (Triticum spelta) was also stored simultaneously at the same location in a fabric intermediate bulk container (FIBC) bag with maximum capacity of 1 t. Neither structure was mechanically aerated. Grain moisture and temperature were monitored during the spring and start of the summer period of the year 2017 because of the biggest differences between the night and day temperatures. For monitoring of the grain microbiological changes samples were taken for laboratory tests during the whole experiment. Grain quality parameters measured during storage included the bulk density, crude protein, falling number, germination, gluten content, sedimentation index and contamination by mycotoxins. Monitored outdoor environment parameters were temperature, dew point and relative humidity. Results showed a strong dependence of the stored material temperature on the outside temperature in the case of FIBC bags (coefficient of determination R2 = 0.927), whereas the dependence was weaker in the larger structure (R2 = 0.625). Mycotoxins monitored during the period were below the detection limit in both cases. © 2019, Eesti Pollumajandusulikool. All rights reserved.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>SC</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi SCOPUS
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
40106 - Agronomy, plant breeding and plant protection; (Agricultural biotechnology to be 4.4)
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
<a href="/cs/project/QJ1510204" target="_blank" >QJ1510204: Technologie a metody pro zachování kvality, bezpečnosti a nutriční hodnoty vybraných rostlinných surovin</a><br>
Návaznosti
P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2019
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Agronomy Research
ISSN
1406-894X
e-ISSN
1406-894X
Svazek periodika
17
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
6
Stát vydavatele periodika
EE - Estonská republika
Počet stran výsledku
8
Strana od-do
2203-2210
Kód UT WoS článku
—
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-85076458054