China’s Approach to Regional Cooperation

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F26482789%3A_____%2F16%3AN0000027" target="_blank" >RIV/26482789:_____/16:N0000027 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0009445516646242" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0009445516646242</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0009445516646242" target="_blank" >10.1177/0009445516646242</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

China’s Approach to Regional Cooperation

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

China’s rise has inspired a variety of interpretations arguing for either its potentially disruptive or alternatively its benign impact on Asia–Pacific security. This article aims to contribute to this debate. It focuses on the upsurge in Beijing’s multilateral diplomacy since the beginning of the 1990s, which has been reflected in China’s willingness to take part in many regional institutions, such as Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), the Six Party Talks (6PT), East Asia Summit (EAS) or Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC). But what are China’s motivations for participation in these institutions? Are they instrumental, driven by pragmatic self-interest, or moral, driven by normative values of peace? Or, has China merely accepted the need to play a socially ‘appropriate’ role within the region? The article offers a theoretically informed typology of the different kinds of motivation that can explain China’s multilateral diplomacy in the last three decades. It argues that whereas social motivation played a decisive part in the first phase of China’s multilateralism, instrumental motivation can be seen as defining the more recent phase.

Název v anglickém jazyce

China’s Approach to Regional Cooperation

Popis výsledku anglicky

China’s rise has inspired a variety of interpretations arguing for either its potentially disruptive or alternatively its benign impact on Asia–Pacific security. This article aims to contribute to this debate. It focuses on the upsurge in Beijing’s multilateral diplomacy since the beginning of the 1990s, which has been reflected in China’s willingness to take part in many regional institutions, such as Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), the Six Party Talks (6PT), East Asia Summit (EAS) or Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC). But what are China’s motivations for participation in these institutions? Are they instrumental, driven by pragmatic self-interest, or moral, driven by normative values of peace? Or, has China merely accepted the need to play a socially ‘appropriate’ role within the region? The article offers a theoretically informed typology of the different kinds of motivation that can explain China’s multilateral diplomacy in the last three decades. It argues that whereas social motivation played a decisive part in the first phase of China’s multilateralism, instrumental motivation can be seen as defining the more recent phase.

Druh

J_x - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)

CEP obor

AD - Politologie a politické vědy

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/GA16-02288S" target="_blank" >GA16-02288S: Anatomie revizionismu a jeho vliv na (sub-)regionální institucionalizace a aliance</a><br>

Návaznosti

P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Rok uplatnění

2016

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

China Report

ISSN

0009-4455

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

52

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

3

Stát vydavatele periodika

IN - Indická republika

Počet stran výsledku

19

Strana od-do

192-210

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—