Harmonization of the protection against misleading commercial practices: ongoing divergences in Central European countries.

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F26482789%3A_____%2F19%3AN0000065" target="_blank" >RIV/26482789:_____/19:N0000065 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://economic-research.pl/Journals/index.php/oc/article/view/1569" target="_blank" >http://economic-research.pl/Journals/index.php/oc/article/view/1569</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.24136/oc.2019.012" target="_blank" >10.24136/oc.2019.012</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Harmonization of the protection against misleading commercial practices: ongoing divergences in Central European countries.

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Purpose of the article: The primary purpose is to comparatively describe and critically assess the transposed legal frameworks. The secondary purpose is to study and evaluate their coherence in the light of the case law and their impact in Central Europe, in particular whether it represents an opportunity or a threat for the smart, sustainable and inclusive growth, i.e. boosting competitiveness and innovation along with consumer welfare. Methods: The cross-disciplinary and multi-jurisdictional nature of this paper, and its dual purposes, implies the use of Meta-Analysis, of various interpretation tech-niques suitable for legal texts and judicial decisions, of the critical comparison and of a holistic assessment of approaches and impacts. Legislation and case law are explored and the yielded knowledge and data are confronted with a field search and case studies. The dominating qualitative research and data are complemented by the quantitative research and data. Findings & Value added: For over one decade, the Unfair Commercial Practices Directive requires full harmonization of the protection against, among other items, misleading commercial practices, by legislatures and judges in the EU. The explo-ration pursuant to the two purposes suggests that this ambitious legislative and case law project entails a number of transposition approaches with varying levels of coherence, importance and impacts on the competitiveness and innovation of business and consumer welfare in Central Europe. Therefore, full harmonization should be either readjusted or relaxed.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Harmonization of the protection against misleading commercial practices: ongoing divergences in Central European countries.

Popis výsledku anglicky

Purpose of the article: The primary purpose is to comparatively describe and critically assess the transposed legal frameworks. The secondary purpose is to study and evaluate their coherence in the light of the case law and their impact in Central Europe, in particular whether it represents an opportunity or a threat for the smart, sustainable and inclusive growth, i.e. boosting competitiveness and innovation along with consumer welfare. Methods: The cross-disciplinary and multi-jurisdictional nature of this paper, and its dual purposes, implies the use of Meta-Analysis, of various interpretation tech-niques suitable for legal texts and judicial decisions, of the critical comparison and of a holistic assessment of approaches and impacts. Legislation and case law are explored and the yielded knowledge and data are confronted with a field search and case studies. The dominating qualitative research and data are complemented by the quantitative research and data. Findings & Value added: For over one decade, the Unfair Commercial Practices Directive requires full harmonization of the protection against, among other items, misleading commercial practices, by legislatures and judges in the EU. The explo-ration pursuant to the two purposes suggests that this ambitious legislative and case law project entails a number of transposition approaches with varying levels of coherence, importance and impacts on the competitiveness and innovation of business and consumer welfare in Central Europe. Therefore, full harmonization should be either readjusted or relaxed.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50501 - Law

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/GA17-11867S" target="_blank" >GA17-11867S: Komparace interakce práva proti nekalé soutěži a práva duševního vlastnictví a její důsledky ve středoevropském kontextu</a><br>

Návaznosti

P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Rok uplatnění

2019

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Oeconomia Copernicana

ISSN

2083-1277

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

10

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

2

Stát vydavatele periodika

PL - Polská republika

Počet stran výsledku

14

Strana od-do

239-252

Kód UT WoS článku

000475440300002

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—