Whose Security? V4 States at a Crossroad between EU and NATO

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F26482789%3A_____%2F20%3AN0000146" target="_blank" >RIV/26482789:_____/20:N0000146 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/whose-security-v4-states-at-a-crossroad-between-eu-and-nato/viewer" target="_blank" >https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/whose-security-v4-states-at-a-crossroad-between-eu-and-nato/viewer</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Whose Security? V4 States at a Crossroad between EU and NATO

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

States of Visegrad group (Czech Republic, Hungary, Slovakia and Poland) are part of community that fights against terrorism. This activity is not optional. Differences in views with whom to fight can be observable. EU established missions to secure EU territory and fight terrorism as a side effect of fragile states (EUNAVFOR Med Sophia, EUNAVFOR Somalia), however V4 states are not so active in those missions. On the contrary NATO also performs anti-terrorism missions, where the V4 states are more active. In this article author is applying role theory (one of recognized direction of foreign policy analysis) to show what role V4 states perform towards EU and NATO in the questions of fight against terrorism. Role theory enables the study of political discourse around areas that create particular roles. Roles result from foreign policy analysis. The second aim is to give an explanation of their (non-)participation in active involvement in the general in the fight against terrorism within the EU, or NATO.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Whose Security? V4 States at a Crossroad between EU and NATO

Popis výsledku anglicky

States of Visegrad group (Czech Republic, Hungary, Slovakia and Poland) are part of community that fights against terrorism. This activity is not optional. Differences in views with whom to fight can be observable. EU established missions to secure EU territory and fight terrorism as a side effect of fragile states (EUNAVFOR Med Sophia, EUNAVFOR Somalia), however V4 states are not so active in those missions. On the contrary NATO also performs anti-terrorism missions, where the V4 states are more active. In this article author is applying role theory (one of recognized direction of foreign policy analysis) to show what role V4 states perform towards EU and NATO in the questions of fight against terrorism. Role theory enables the study of political discourse around areas that create particular roles. Roles result from foreign policy analysis. The second aim is to give an explanation of their (non-)participation in active involvement in the general in the fight against terrorism within the EU, or NATO.

Druh

J_ost - Ostatní články v recenzovaných periodicích

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50601 - Political science

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2020

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Visegrad Europe. Central European Journal

ISSN

2686-9756

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

5-6/2020

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

1-2/2020

Stát vydavatele periodika

RU - Ruská federace

Počet stran výsledku

18

Strana od-do

74-91

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—