Why is Japan shamed for whaling more than Norway? International Society and its barbaric others

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F26482789%3A_____%2F22%3A10152239" target="_blank" >RIV/26482789:_____/22:10152239 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://academic.oup.com/irap/advance-article-abstract/doi/10.1093/irap/lcab012/6343135?redirectedFrom=fulltext" target="_blank" >https://academic.oup.com/irap/advance-article-abstract/doi/10.1093/irap/lcab012/6343135?redirectedFrom=fulltext</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/irap/lcab012" target="_blank" >10.1093/irap/lcab012</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Why is Japan shamed for whaling more than Norway? International Society and its barbaric others

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Although Norwegian and Japanese fishermen killed almost identical numbers of whales in the last two decades, they were subject to a largely uneven attention from the international community. While Japan was significantly shamed by all actors, the attention on Norwegian whalers was much smaller. Why is that? The article first conceptualizes the gaps in contemporary shaming literature and shows that whereas lots has been written on why and how states shame, much less has been written about why some actors are shamed more and some less. To remedy that, it then adopts post-structural theoretical position and the methodology of discourse analysis to deconstruct anti-whaling campaigns against Japan and Norway. The analysis shows that whereas Japanese culture was often depicted as cruel and barbarous, and its science as faulty and illegitimate, Norway was largely spared of this discourse. I argue that this difference can be ascribed to differing identities between the Euro-American anti-whaling camp and Japan.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Why is Japan shamed for whaling more than Norway? International Society and its barbaric others

Popis výsledku anglicky

Although Norwegian and Japanese fishermen killed almost identical numbers of whales in the last two decades, they were subject to a largely uneven attention from the international community. While Japan was significantly shamed by all actors, the attention on Norwegian whalers was much smaller. Why is that? The article first conceptualizes the gaps in contemporary shaming literature and shows that whereas lots has been written on why and how states shame, much less has been written about why some actors are shamed more and some less. To remedy that, it then adopts post-structural theoretical position and the methodology of discourse analysis to deconstruct anti-whaling campaigns against Japan and Norway. The analysis shows that whereas Japanese culture was often depicted as cruel and barbarous, and its science as faulty and illegitimate, Norway was largely spared of this discourse. I argue that this difference can be ascribed to differing identities between the Euro-American anti-whaling camp and Japan.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50601 - Political science

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2022

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

International Relations of the Asia-Pacific

ISSN

1470-482X

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

22

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

2/2022

Stát vydavatele periodika

GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska

Počet stran výsledku

30

Strana od-do

267-296

Kód UT WoS článku

000756426900001

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85130052119