The Specter of Signification: Meillassoux’s Speculative Materialism and Wittgenstein’s Tractatus on the Empty Sign and Its Iteration
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F26482789%3A_____%2F25%3A10152893" target="_blank" >RIV/26482789:_____/25:10152893 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://www.revue-klesis.org/index.html#d59" target="_blank" >https://www.revue-klesis.org/index.html#d59</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
—
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
The Specter of Signification: Meillassoux’s Speculative Materialism and Wittgenstein’s Tractatus on the Empty Sign and Its Iteration
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
While defending his speculative materialism, Quentin Meillassoux has accused many thinkers of a « correlationism » in which the cognizing subject is incapable of reaching the reality indifferent to human thought. The prime instances he gives of strong correlationism are Wittgenstein’s Tractatus and Heidegger’s fundamental ontology. In this article, I argue that Meillassoux’s speculative materialism closely resembles Wittgenstein’s Tractatus. They share a fundamental belief in the contingency of all entities. Wittgenstein advances the picture theory of meaning, in which language and reality are correlated. However, on closer inspection, the picture theory operates on two levels: the level of names referring to objects and the level of propositions referring to facts. I argue that the former level is very close to Meillassoux’s theory of the empty sign that is devoid of meaning and capable of identical iteration. This is, he claims, the distinguishing feature of mathematical discourse, which is capable of accessing mind-independent reality. If this is so, then either some correlations are capable of accessing that reality or, more importantly, the notion of correlation must be specified more precisely. At the same time, I wish to argue that Meillassoux’s derivation of the empty sign can be taken as complementing the Tractatus, because Meillassoux argues that a sign is thinkable without any signification. In the final part of the paper, I evaluate Meillassoux’s argument for, the facticity of every correlation, and argue that Wittgenstein’s Tractatus, under certain interpretations, can escape this critique.
Název v anglickém jazyce
The Specter of Signification: Meillassoux’s Speculative Materialism and Wittgenstein’s Tractatus on the Empty Sign and Its Iteration
Popis výsledku anglicky
While defending his speculative materialism, Quentin Meillassoux has accused many thinkers of a « correlationism » in which the cognizing subject is incapable of reaching the reality indifferent to human thought. The prime instances he gives of strong correlationism are Wittgenstein’s Tractatus and Heidegger’s fundamental ontology. In this article, I argue that Meillassoux’s speculative materialism closely resembles Wittgenstein’s Tractatus. They share a fundamental belief in the contingency of all entities. Wittgenstein advances the picture theory of meaning, in which language and reality are correlated. However, on closer inspection, the picture theory operates on two levels: the level of names referring to objects and the level of propositions referring to facts. I argue that the former level is very close to Meillassoux’s theory of the empty sign that is devoid of meaning and capable of identical iteration. This is, he claims, the distinguishing feature of mathematical discourse, which is capable of accessing mind-independent reality. If this is so, then either some correlations are capable of accessing that reality or, more importantly, the notion of correlation must be specified more precisely. At the same time, I wish to argue that Meillassoux’s derivation of the empty sign can be taken as complementing the Tractatus, because Meillassoux argues that a sign is thinkable without any signification. In the final part of the paper, I evaluate Meillassoux’s argument for, the facticity of every correlation, and argue that Wittgenstein’s Tractatus, under certain interpretations, can escape this critique.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>ost</sub> - Ostatní články v recenzovaných periodicích
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
60301 - Philosophy, History and Philosophy of science and technology
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
<a href="/cs/project/GA23-06827S" target="_blank" >GA23-06827S: Ornament: estetika, politika a metafyzika opakování</a><br>
Návaznosti
P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2025
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Klēsis - Revue de philosophie
ISSN
1954-3050
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
59
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
2025
Stát vydavatele periodika
FR - Francouzská republika
Počet stran výsledku
20
Strana od-do
1-19
Kód UT WoS článku
—
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
—