Dynamic Industries Require a Dynamic Aproach to Law? On the ILLUMINA GRAIL Takeover

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F29142890%3A_____%2F23%3A00045250" target="_blank" >RIV/29142890:_____/23:00045250 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://hrcak.srce.hr/clanak/440537" target="_blank" >https://hrcak.srce.hr/clanak/440537</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.22598/iele.2023.10.1.3" target="_blank" >10.22598/iele.2023.10.1.3</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Dynamic Industries Require a Dynamic Aproach to Law? On the ILLUMINA GRAIL Takeover

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

The factually complicated and legally innovative development of the Grail by Illumina takeover case is now more than two years old and there is still no final denouement in sight. It is a case with significant implications for the future development of the application of EU competition law in the area of takeover control. In this case, the Commission has tested both its new approach to the use of Article 22 EUMR and the application of the harm theory of foreclosure of rivals from a market that is nascent and will reach its full potential only in the future. This text seeks to outline the complicated development of the case, the various aspects of which are now being dealt with in parallel before the Commission, the General Court, and the Court of Justice. In addition, it seeks to show which questions of the future EU merger control regime have already been answered, which remain to be answered and what are the limits of the search for answers.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Dynamic Industries Require a Dynamic Aproach to Law? On the ILLUMINA GRAIL Takeover

Popis výsledku anglicky

The factually complicated and legally innovative development of the Grail by Illumina takeover case is now more than two years old and there is still no final denouement in sight. It is a case with significant implications for the future development of the application of EU competition law in the area of takeover control. In this case, the Commission has tested both its new approach to the use of Article 22 EUMR and the application of the harm theory of foreclosure of rivals from a market that is nascent and will reach its full potential only in the future. This text seeks to outline the complicated development of the case, the various aspects of which are now being dealt with in parallel before the Commission, the General Court, and the Court of Justice. In addition, it seeks to show which questions of the future EU merger control regime have already been answered, which remain to be answered and what are the limits of the search for answers.

Druh

J_SC - Článek v periodiku v databázi SCOPUS

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50501 - Law

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

N - Vyzkumna aktivita podporovana z neverejnych zdroju

Rok uplatnění

2023

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

InterEULawEast

ISSN

1849-3734

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

10

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

1

Stát vydavatele periodika

HR - Chorvatská republika

Počet stran výsledku

22

Strana od-do

45-66

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85164797844