The rise of new populist political parties in Czech parliamentary elections between 2010 and 2017: the geography of party replacement

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F44555601%3A13410%2F19%3A43895042" target="_blank" >RIV/44555601:13410/19:43895042 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/15387216.2019.1691928" target="_blank" >https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/15387216.2019.1691928</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15387216.2019.1691928" target="_blank" >10.1080/15387216.2019.1691928</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

The rise of new populist political parties in Czech parliamentary elections between 2010 and 2017: the geography of party replacement

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

This article examines the territorialization of party replacement in the Czech Republic between 2010 and 2017. Using spatial analytical techniques, we found that despite the significant success of new populist parties, which considerably transformed the parliamentary strength of individual parties, the &quot;new&quot; geographical patterning of party support was far from real transformation. Historically, most of the rightist and center-right parties relied on higher support in areas with a high development potential and the developmental axes related to them, whereas established left-wing parties found support in areas with a low development potential. The elections of 2010 and 2013 were exceptions to this pattern, but the elections of 2017 interrupted this deviation when geographical support for some of the new populist parties (those which had succeed in 2013 already) moved mostly to underdeveloped areas. However, as the programmatics of most of the new populist parties are relatively unclear (especially on the left-right ideological division), one can hardly speak of class realignment, but rather of spatial restratification of Czech politics: traditionally leftist and rightist voters largely abandoned &quot;their&quot; (established) parties, but on the other hand, their voting mostly did not contravene the Czech spatial division between leftist and rightist regions.

Název v anglickém jazyce

The rise of new populist political parties in Czech parliamentary elections between 2010 and 2017: the geography of party replacement

Popis výsledku anglicky

This article examines the territorialization of party replacement in the Czech Republic between 2010 and 2017. Using spatial analytical techniques, we found that despite the significant success of new populist parties, which considerably transformed the parliamentary strength of individual parties, the &quot;new&quot; geographical patterning of party support was far from real transformation. Historically, most of the rightist and center-right parties relied on higher support in areas with a high development potential and the developmental axes related to them, whereas established left-wing parties found support in areas with a low development potential. The elections of 2010 and 2013 were exceptions to this pattern, but the elections of 2017 interrupted this deviation when geographical support for some of the new populist parties (those which had succeed in 2013 already) moved mostly to underdeveloped areas. However, as the programmatics of most of the new populist parties are relatively unclear (especially on the left-right ideological division), one can hardly speak of class realignment, but rather of spatial restratification of Czech politics: traditionally leftist and rightist voters largely abandoned &quot;their&quot; (established) parties, but on the other hand, their voting mostly did not contravene the Czech spatial division between leftist and rightist regions.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50601 - Political science

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2019

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Eurasian geography and economics

ISSN

1538-7216

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

60

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

5

Stát vydavatele periodika

GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska

Počet stran výsledku

37

Strana od-do

511-547

Kód UT WoS článku

000498457600001

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85075451941